FLKR vs. METL

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) and METL (Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLKR is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index, while METL is a Commodity Producers Equities fund actively managed by Sprott. FLKR is passively managed, while METL is actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLKR charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for METL.

Performance

FLKR vs. METL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLKR achieves a 86.43% return, which is significantly higher than METL's 7.51% return.

FLKR

• 1D: 6.28%
• 1M: -2.80%
• YTD: 86.43%
• 6M: 95.63%
• 1Y: 177.77%
• 3Y*: 43.23%
• 5Y*: 16.65%
• 10Y*: —

METL

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: -9.97%
• YTD: 7.51%
• 6M: 15.84%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLKR vs. METL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	86.43%	28.44%
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF	7.51%	27.04%

Correlation

The correlation between FLKR and METL is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025	0.51

Return for Risk

FLKR vs. METL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLKR

FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 94
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLKR vs. METL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLKR	METL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.03	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.85	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.77	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	27.92	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLKR	METL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.03	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	1.18	-0.70

Drawdowns

FLKR vs. METL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLKR drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, which is greater than METL's maximum drawdown of -27.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLKR and METL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLKR	METL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.06%	-27.39%	-22.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.03%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.39%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.59%	-18.48%	+3.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.06%	-8.24%	-13.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.40%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FLKR	METL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.26%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.64%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.43%	44.85%	-0.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.12%	44.85%	-15.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.11%	44.85%	-16.74%

FLKR vs. METL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLKR has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than METL's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLKR vs. METL - Dividend Comparison

FLKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than METL's 0.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	2.07%	3.87%	7.08%	2.28%	3.13%	2.12%	0.99%	2.09%	1.86%	1.02%
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF	0.92%	0.99%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLKR and METL in my portfolio?

FLKR and METL have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FLKR or METL?

On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLKR or METL?

FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for METL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLKR or METL?

FLKR has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 0.92% for METL.

What is the main difference between FLKR and METL?

FLKR is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while METL is Commodity Producers Equities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLKR and 0.89% for METL.