FLJH vs. GSJY

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FLJH (Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF) and GSJY (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - FLJH tracks the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index while GSJY tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLJH returned 20.83%/yr vs 9.38%/yr for GSJY. Their 0.80 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FLJH charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GSJY.

Performance

FLJH vs. GSJY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLJH achieves a 17.59% return, which is significantly higher than GSJY's 14.32% return.

FLJH

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: -2.85%
• 6M: 11.67%
• YTD: 17.59%
• 1Y: 37.64%
• 3Y*: 25.95%
• 5Y*: 20.83%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.16%

GSJY

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.76%
• 6M: 7.61%
• YTD: 14.32%
• 1Y: 29.56%
• 3Y*: 17.96%
• 5Y*: 9.38%
• 10Y*: 9.05%
• ALL TIME*: 9.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF	$3.00M	$2.06M	$1.54M
GSJY Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF	$176.08K	$192.71K	$274.31K

FLJH vs. GSJY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF	17.59%	25.26%	25.89%	36.02%	-2.75%	12.68%	10.65%	20.34%	-14.66%	1.26%
GSJY Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF	14.32%	26.22%	8.89%	19.18%	-16.15%	0.41%	13.81%	18.29%	-11.56%	2.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FLJH and GSJY is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.80

The correlation between FLJH and GSJY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLJH vs. GSJY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLJH	GSJY
Industrials	23.5%	23.3%
Technology	23.1%	23.3%
Financial Services	16.2%	18.8%
Consumer Cyclical	12.1%	12.0%
Communication Services	7.1%	5.9%
Healthcare	5.2%	4.6%
Basic Materials	4.0%	3.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.0%	3.1%
Real Estate	2.9%	1.2%
Utilities	1.2%	1.5%
Energy	0.8%	3.0%

Return for Risk

FLJH vs. GSJY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLJH

FLJH Risk / Return Rank: 83
FLJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FLJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FLJH Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FLJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FLJH Martin Ratio Rank: 85

GSJY

GSJY Risk / Return Rank: 57
GSJY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
GSJY Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
GSJY Omega Ratio Rank: 60
GSJY Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
GSJY Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLJH vs. GSJY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLJH	GSJY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	1.45	+0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.66	2.06	+0.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.27	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.50	2.11	+1.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.36	6.76	+5.60

FLJH vs. GSJY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLJH Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the GSJY Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLJH and GSJY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLJH vs. GSJY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLJH drawdown since its inception was -31.51%, roughly equal to the maximum GSJY drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLJH and GSJY.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLJH	GSJY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.51%	-32.53%	+1.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.80%	-14.08%	+3.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.39%	-14.96%	-5.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.39%	-32.53%	+12.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.15%	-2.46%	-3.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.27%	-7.52%	+2.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.05%	4.39%	-1.34%

Volatility

FLJH vs. GSJY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) is 6.30%, while Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) has a volatility of 6.92%. This indicates that FLJH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSJY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLJH	GSJY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.30%	6.92%	-0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.22%	17.21%	-1.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.14%	20.50%	-1.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.76%	18.41%	+0.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.88%	17.16%	+2.72%

FLJH vs. GSJY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLJH has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than GSJY's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FLJH vs. GSJY - Dividend Comparison

FLJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, more than GSJY's 2.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF	2.56%	3.90%	5.06%	25.59%	26.67%	1.29%	0.00%	0.00%	5.92%	0.10%	0.00%
GSJY Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF	2.03%	1.99%	1.64%	2.11%	2.13%	1.73%	1.22%	2.79%	3.28%	1.70%	2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLJH and GSJY in my portfolio?

FLJH and GSJY have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLJH or GSJY?

GSJY has higher volatility (6.92%) compared to FLJH (6.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLJH dropped -31.51% vs GSJY's -32.53%.

Which ETF is better, FLJH or GSJY?

On 5-year performance, FLJH leads with 20.83% vs 9.38% for GSJY. On fees, FLJH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLJH has been the lower-risk option at 6.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLJH or GSJY?

Over the 5-year period, FLJH has performed better with a 20.83% return vs 9.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLJH or GSJY?

FLJH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GSJY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLJH or GSJY?

FLJH has the higher dividend yield at 2.56%, compared with 2.03% for GSJY.

What is the main difference between FLJH and GSJY?

FLJH tracks FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index, while GSJY tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLJH and 0.25% for GSJY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLJH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.