FLIA vs. KBND

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FLIA (Franklin Liberty International Aggregate Bond ETF) and KBND (KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF) are both International Government Bonds funds. FLIA is actively managed, while KBND is passively managed. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLIA charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for KBND.

Performance

FLIA vs. KBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Liberty International Aggregate Bond ETF (FLIA) and KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF (KBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FLIA

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.78%
• YTD: 1.03%
• 6M: 0.59%
• 1Y: 2.12%
• 3Y*: 3.38%
• 5Y*: 0.89%
• 10Y*: —

KBND

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLIA vs. KBND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FLIA Franklin Liberty International Aggregate Bond ETF	1.03%	2.12%	2.42%	7.17%	-7.68%	-1.98%	1.37%	7.58%	-2.59%
KBND KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.89%	3.13%	-6.81%	4.41%	9.38%	1.25%	-5.29%

Correlation

The correlation between FLIA and KBND is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2018	0.07

Return for Risk

FLIA vs. KBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLIA

FLIA Risk / Return Rank: 20
FLIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
FLIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
FLIA Omega Ratio Rank: 18
FLIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
FLIA Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLIA vs. KBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty International Aggregate Bond ETF (FLIA) and KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF (KBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLIA	KBND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.64	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.93	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.04	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.77	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLIA	KBND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FLIA	KBND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.04%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.79%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.80%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.77%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FLIA	KBND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.18%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.49%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.34%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.42%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.71%	—	—

FLIA vs. KBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLIA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than KBND's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLIA vs. KBND - Dividend Comparison

FLIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, while KBND has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLIA Franklin Liberty International Aggregate Bond ETF	2.70%	2.62%	2.97%	0.93%	18.12%	2.26%	0.43%	2.93%	1.23%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KBND KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.40%	2.20%	2.51%	6.97%	2.27%	3.47%	4.98%	0.00%	0.04%	1.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLIA and KBND in my portfolio?

FLIA and KBND have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FLIA or KBND?

On fees, FLIA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLIA or KBND?

FLIA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KBND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLIA or KBND?

FLIA has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 0.00% for KBND.

What is the main difference between FLIA and KBND?

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FLIA and 0.50% for KBND.