PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLGR vs. LVHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLGR vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) and Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLGR achieves a -2.86% return, which is significantly lower than LVHD's 11.18% return.


FLGR

1D
-1.28%
1M
-3.55%
YTD
-2.86%
6M
-3.03%
1Y
-0.38%
3Y*
16.15%
5Y*
6.08%
10Y*

LVHD

1D
0.57%
1M
1.58%
YTD
11.18%
6M
10.55%
1Y
14.00%
3Y*
10.99%
5Y*
7.42%
10Y*
8.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLGR vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLGR
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF
-2.86%36.67%10.63%24.22%-21.96%5.40%12.11%19.99%-21.50%-0.16%
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
11.18%7.50%10.18%-0.95%-1.82%26.90%-1.28%22.91%-5.58%4.14%

Correlation

The correlation between FLGR and LVHD is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.45

Over the past year, the correlation between FLGR and LVHD has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FLGR vs. LVHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLGR
LVHD

Industrials

29.9%
4.9%

Financial Services

20.5%
8.2%

Technology

16.1%
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
7.4%

Communication Services

6.4%
2.6%

Healthcare

5.6%
4.4%

Basic Materials

5.6%

-

Utilities

4.5%
24.8%

Consumer Defensive

1.4%
21.8%

Real Estate

1.2%
15.4%

Energy

-

7.4%

Industrials

FLGR
29.9%
LVHD
4.9%

Financial Services

FLGR
20.5%
LVHD
8.2%

Technology

FLGR
16.1%
LVHD
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FLGR
8.7%
LVHD
7.4%

Communication Services

FLGR
6.4%
LVHD
2.6%

Healthcare

FLGR
5.6%
LVHD
4.4%

Basic Materials

FLGR
5.6%
LVHD

-

Utilities

FLGR
4.5%
LVHD
24.8%

Consumer Defensive

FLGR
1.4%
LVHD
21.8%

Real Estate

FLGR
1.2%
LVHD
15.4%

Energy

FLGR

-

LVHD
7.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLGR vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLGR
FLGR Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
FLGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLGR Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
FLGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLGR Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

LVHD
LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLGR vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) and Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLGRLVHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.24

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.03

2.28

-2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.07

5.67

-5.74

FLGR vs. LVHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLGR Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the LVHD Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLGR and LVHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLGR vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLGR drawdown since its inception was -46.21%, which is greater than LVHD's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLGR and LVHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLGRLVHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.21%

-37.32%

-8.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.44%

-6.17%

-8.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.53%

-14.29%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.69%

-16.75%

-25.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.40%

-0.86%

-6.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.32%

-4.03%

-8.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.17%

2.48%

+2.69%

Volatility

FLGR vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) has a higher volatility of 5.40% compared to Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) at 4.04%. This indicates that FLGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLGRLVHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.40%

4.04%

+1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.60%

7.23%

+7.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.51%

9.95%

+7.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.32%

12.92%

+7.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.41%

15.53%

+5.88%

FLGR vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLGR has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLGR vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison

FLGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than LVHD's 3.27% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLGR
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF
0.33%1.72%2.40%2.99%3.50%2.67%2.61%2.52%3.06%0.00%0.00%
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
3.27%3.35%4.23%3.55%3.30%2.56%3.27%3.30%3.82%3.33%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLGR and LVHD have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLGR has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to LVHD (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLGR dropped -46.21% vs LVHD's -37.32%.

On 5-year performance, LVHD leads with 7.42% vs 6.08% for FLGR. On fees, FLGR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, LVHD has been the lower-risk option at 4.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LVHD has performed better with a 7.42% return vs 6.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLGR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for LVHD.

LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 0.33% for FLGR.

FLGR is categorized as Europe Equities, while LVHD is Dividend. FLGR tracks FTSE Germany RIC Capped Index, while LVHD tracks Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLGR and 0.27% for LVHD.

LVHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLGR and LVHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer