FLGR vs. EWS
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) and iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS).
FLGR and EWS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLGR is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Germany RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. EWS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Singapore Index. It was launched on Mar 12, 1996. Both FLGR and EWS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FLGR vs. EWS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLGR vs. EWS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLGR Franklin FTSE Germany ETF | -5.28% | 36.67% | 10.63% | 24.22% | -21.96% | 5.40% | 12.11% | 19.99% | -21.50% | -0.27% |
EWS iShares MSCI Singapore ETF | 3.53% | 31.35% | 22.10% | 6.15% | -9.80% | 5.47% | -8.47% | 14.54% | -11.34% | 3.76% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLGR achieves a -5.28% return, which is significantly lower than EWS's 3.53% return.
FLGR
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -6.28%
- YTD
- -5.28%
- 6M
- -4.34%
- 1Y
- 10.13%
- 3Y*
- 15.65%
- 5Y*
- 6.59%
- 10Y*
- —
EWS
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 3.53%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- 24.63%
- 3Y*
- 18.65%
- 5Y*
- 8.76%
- 10Y*
- 7.21%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLGR vs. EWS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLGR has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than EWS's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLGR vs. EWS — Risk / Return Rank
FLGR
EWS
FLGR vs. EWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) and iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLGR | EWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.50 | 1.23 | -0.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.86 | 1.84 | -0.98 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.27 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.73 | 1.61 | -0.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.27 | 6.90 | -4.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLGR | EWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 | 1.23 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.51 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.14 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLGR and EWS is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FLGR vs. EWS - Dividend Comparison
FLGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than EWS's 3.96% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLGR Franklin FTSE Germany ETF | 1.82% | 1.72% | 2.40% | 2.99% | 3.50% | 2.67% | 2.61% | 2.52% | 3.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EWS iShares MSCI Singapore ETF | 3.96% | 4.10% | 4.28% | 6.50% | 2.56% | 6.00% | 2.68% | 4.70% | 4.21% | 3.46% | 3.96% | 4.20% |
Drawdowns
FLGR vs. EWS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLGR drawdown since its inception was -46.21%, smaller than the maximum EWS drawdown of -75.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLGR and EWS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLGR | EWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.21% | -75.00% | +28.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.44% | -15.61% | +1.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.54% | -29.06% | -14.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.72% | -3.23% | -6.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.51% | -22.00% | +9.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.62% | 3.63% | +0.99% |
Volatility
FLGR vs. EWS - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) has a higher volatility of 8.23% compared to iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) at 6.58%. This indicates that FLGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLGR | EWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.23% | 6.58% | +1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.44% | 11.36% | +1.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.18% | 20.04% | +0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.10% | 17.24% | +2.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.43% | 18.03% | +3.40% |