FLCH vs. ISHP

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) and ISHP (First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLCH is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China RIC Capped Index, while ISHP is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the S-Network Global E-Commerce Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLCH returned -4.90%/yr vs 1.58%/yr for ISHP. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLCH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ISHP.

Performance

FLCH vs. ISHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCH achieves a -10.43% return, which is significantly higher than ISHP's -11.94% return.

FLCH

• 1D: 1.38%
• 1M: -2.35%
• 6M: -15.07%
• YTD: -10.43%
• 1Y: -1.41%
• 3Y*: 7.85%
• 5Y*: -4.90%
• 10Y*: —

ISHP

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 2.21%
• 6M: -15.90%
• YTD: -11.94%
• 1Y: -11.94%
• 3Y*: 8.13%
• 5Y*: 1.58%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCH vs. ISHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	-10.43%	32.55%	18.00%	-11.21%	-22.74%	-20.87%	30.09%	24.32%	-19.52%	1.51%
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF	-11.94%	12.27%	24.17%	22.24%	-33.79%	30.09%	15.33%	19.74%	-2.04%	9.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCH and ISHP is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.49

The correlation between FLCH and ISHP shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.62 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLCH vs. ISHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLCH	ISHP
Consumer Cyclical	20.0%	41.1%
Financial Services	18.3%	1.6%
Communication Services	14.9%	24.8%
Technology	13.9%	10.3%
Industrials	11.1%	13.3%
Healthcare	5.7%	2.5%
Basic Materials	5.2%	-
Energy	3.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.2%	1.5%
Utilities	1.8%	-
Real Estate	1.6%	4.9%

Return for Risk

FLCH vs. ISHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCH

FLCH Risk / Return Rank: 8
FLCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
FLCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
FLCH Omega Ratio Rank: 8
FLCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
FLCH Martin Ratio Rank: 8

ISHP

ISHP Risk / Return Rank: 4
ISHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
ISHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
ISHP Omega Ratio Rank: 4
ISHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
ISHP Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCH vs. ISHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLCH	ISHP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.07	-0.68	+0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.04	-0.84	+0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	0.90	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.07	-0.48	+0.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.15	-0.90	+0.75

FLCH vs. ISHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCH Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is higher than the ISHP Sharpe Ratio of -0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCH and ISHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLCH vs. ISHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCH drawdown since its inception was -62.09%, which is greater than ISHP's maximum drawdown of -47.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCH and ISHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLCH	ISHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.09%	-47.57%	-14.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.48%	-24.75%	+3.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.43%	-24.75%	-0.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.77%	-47.57%	-5.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.86%	-19.10%	-17.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.60%	-12.74%	-17.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.53%	13.26%	-3.73%

Volatility

FLCH vs. ISHP - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) has a higher volatility of 5.66% compared to First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) at 5.21%. This indicates that FLCH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLCH	ISHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.66%	5.21%	+0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.95%	14.24%	-0.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.60%	17.76%	+1.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.58%	27.27%	+2.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.81%	24.04%	+3.77%

FLCH vs. ISHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than ISHP's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLCH vs. ISHP - Dividend Comparison

FLCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, more than ISHP's 1.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	2.42%	2.36%	2.87%	3.47%	2.69%	1.48%	0.91%	1.98%	1.92%	0.01%	0.00%
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF	1.18%	1.34%	1.02%	1.58%	0.76%	0.53%	0.82%	1.16%	0.89%	1.65%	0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLCH and ISHP in my portfolio?

FLCH and ISHP have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLCH or ISHP?

FLCH has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to ISHP (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCH dropped -62.09% vs ISHP's -47.57%.

Which ETF is better, FLCH or ISHP?

On 5-year performance, ISHP leads with 1.58% vs -4.90% for FLCH. On fees, FLCH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ISHP has been the lower-risk option at 5.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLCH or ISHP?

Over the 5-year period, ISHP has performed better with a 1.58% return vs -4.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLCH or ISHP?

FLCH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ISHP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLCH or ISHP?

FLCH has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 1.18% for ISHP.

What is the main difference between FLCH and ISHP?

FLCH is categorized as China Equities, while ISHP is Consumer Discretionary Equities. FLCH tracks FTSE China RIC Capped Index, while ISHP tracks S-Network Global E-Commerce Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLCH and 0.60% for ISHP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLCH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.07 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.