PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCH vs. ISHP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLCH vs. ISHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLCH vs. ISHP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
-5.65%32.55%18.00%-11.21%-22.74%-20.87%30.09%24.32%-19.52%0.91%
ISHP
First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF
-14.81%12.27%24.17%22.24%-33.79%30.09%15.33%19.74%-2.04%9.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCH achieves a -5.65% return, which is significantly higher than ISHP's -14.81% return.


FLCH

1D
0.29%
1M
-4.32%
YTD
-5.65%
6M
-12.56%
1Y
7.43%
3Y*
7.60%
5Y*
-4.85%
10Y*

ISHP

1D
0.00%
1M
-5.71%
YTD
-14.81%
6M
-19.68%
1Y
-6.75%
3Y*
9.13%
5Y*
2.10%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLCH vs. ISHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than ISHP's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FLCH vs. ISHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCH
FLCH Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FLCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCH Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCH Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

ISHP
ISHP Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
ISHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISHP Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
ISHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISHP Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCH vs. ISHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLCHISHPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.32

-0.32

+0.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.59

-0.31

+0.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.96

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.45

-0.26

+0.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.29

-0.74

+2.03

FLCH vs. ISHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCH Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is higher than the ISHP Sharpe Ratio of -0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCH and ISHP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLCHISHPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

-0.32

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

0.08

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.28

-0.26

Correlation

The correlation between FLCH and ISHP is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FLCH vs. ISHP - Dividend Comparison

FLCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, more than ISHP's 1.57% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
2.50%2.36%2.87%3.47%2.69%1.48%0.91%1.98%1.92%0.01%0.00%
ISHP
First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF
1.57%1.34%1.02%1.58%0.76%0.53%0.82%1.16%0.89%1.65%0.23%

Drawdowns

FLCH vs. ISHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCH drawdown since its inception was -62.09%, which is greater than ISHP's maximum drawdown of -47.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCH and ISHP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCHISHPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.09%

-47.57%

-14.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.65%

-24.75%

+8.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.06%

-47.57%

-8.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.49%

-21.74%

-11.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.50%

-12.55%

-17.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.02%

8.68%

-2.66%

Volatility

FLCH vs. ISHP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) is 6.44%, while First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) has a volatility of 7.22%. This indicates that FLCH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLCHISHPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.44%

7.22%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.92%

13.37%

+0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.03%

21.39%

+1.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.58%

27.34%

+2.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.06%

24.19%

+3.87%