FLCH vs. ECNS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) and ECNS (iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLCH is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China RIC Capped Index, while ECNS is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI China Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLCH returned -4.93%/yr vs -6.97%/yr for ECNS. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLCH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for ECNS.

Performance

FLCH vs. ECNS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCH achieves a -6.30% return, which is significantly lower than ECNS's -4.50% return.

FLCH

• 1D: -1.68%
• 1M: -2.79%
• YTD: -6.30%
• 6M: -7.45%
• 1Y: 8.36%
• 3Y*: 10.66%
• 5Y*: -4.93%
• 10Y*: —

ECNS

• 1D: -2.25%
• 1M: -6.37%
• YTD: -4.50%
• 6M: -7.48%
• 1Y: 13.77%
• 3Y*: 7.43%
• 5Y*: -6.97%
• 10Y*: 1.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCH vs. ECNS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	-6.30%	32.55%	18.00%	-11.21%	-22.74%	-20.87%	30.09%	24.32%	-19.52%	0.91%
ECNS iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF	-4.50%	36.49%	5.64%	-23.05%	-24.58%	2.11%	25.42%	7.84%	-18.27%	-0.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCH and ECNS is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017	0.84

The correlation between FLCH and ECNS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLCH vs. ECNS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLCH	ECNS
Consumer Cyclical	23.4%	8.8%
Financial Services	18.2%	4.4%
Communication Services	14.2%	4.5%
Technology	12.9%	16.9%
Industrials	9.1%	16.2%
Basic Materials	5.5%	7.8%
Healthcare	5.3%	19.8%
Energy	3.7%	3.4%
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	4.0%
Utilities	2.0%	2.6%
Real Estate	1.7%	8.8%

Return for Risk

FLCH vs. ECNS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCH

FLCH Risk / Return Rank: 15
FLCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
FLCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
FLCH Omega Ratio Rank: 15
FLCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
FLCH Martin Ratio Rank: 14

ECNS

ECNS Risk / Return Rank: 19
ECNS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
ECNS Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
ECNS Omega Ratio Rank: 20
ECNS Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
ECNS Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCH vs. ECNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLCH	ECNS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.44	0.66	-0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.75	1.00	-0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.13	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.54	0.76	-0.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.14	1.51	-0.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLCH vs. ECNS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCH Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the ECNS Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCH and ECNS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLCH	ECNS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44	0.66	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.17	-0.24	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.07	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.02	0.02	0.00

Drawdowns

FLCH vs. ECNS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCH drawdown since its inception was -62.09%, roughly equal to the maximum ECNS drawdown of -63.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCH and ECNS.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLCH	ECNS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.09%	-63.43%	+1.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.52%	-18.08%	+2.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.43%	-31.72%	+6.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.78%	-59.61%	+3.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-63.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.95%	-38.52%	+4.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.53%	-29.39%	-1.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.38%	9.14%	-1.76%

Volatility

FLCH vs. ECNS - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) has a higher volatility of 6.59% compared to iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) at 5.64%. This indicates that FLCH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLCH	ECNS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.59%	5.64%	+0.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.67%	12.87%	+0.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.22%	20.92%	-1.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.59%	29.44%	+0.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.91%	25.90%	+2.01%

FLCH vs. ECNS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than ECNS's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLCH vs. ECNS - Dividend Comparison

FLCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than ECNS's 6.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ECNS iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF	6.49%	6.20%	5.98%	4.89%	3.54%	4.87%	3.59%	3.23%	6.16%	3.18%	4.29%	3.58%
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	2.52%	2.36%	2.87%	3.47%	2.69%	1.48%	0.91%	1.98%	1.92%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLCH and ECNS in my portfolio?

FLCH and ECNS have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLCH or ECNS?

FLCH has higher volatility (6.59%) compared to ECNS (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCH dropped -62.09% vs ECNS's -63.43%.

Which ETF is better, FLCH or ECNS?

On 5-year performance, FLCH leads with -4.93% vs -6.97% for ECNS. On fees, FLCH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ECNS has been the lower-risk option at 5.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLCH or ECNS?

Over the 5-year period, FLCH has performed better with a -4.93% return vs -6.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLCH or ECNS?

FLCH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for ECNS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLCH or ECNS?

ECNS has the higher dividend yield at 6.49%, compared with 2.52% for FLCH.

What is the main difference between FLCH and ECNS?

FLCH is categorized as China Equities, while ECNS is Asia Pacific Equities. FLCH tracks FTSE China RIC Capped Index, while ECNS tracks MSCI China Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLCH and 0.59% for ECNS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ECNS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.