PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCH vs. CN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLCH vs. CN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FLCH

1D
-1.54%
1M
-8.25%
YTD
-14.03%
6M
-14.94%
1Y
-4.98%
3Y*
8.15%
5Y*
-6.62%
10Y*

CN

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCH vs. CN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
-14.03%32.55%18.00%-11.21%-22.74%-20.87%30.09%24.32%-19.52%1.51%
CN
Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%-3.10%-11.87%-23.85%-12.74%31.55%26.79%-22.41%1.47%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCH and CN is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.83

The correlation between FLCH and CN shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (3 years) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLCH vs. CN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLCH
CN

Consumer Cyclical

25.5%
5.4%

Technology

16.8%
0.3%

Industrials

15.5%
1.0%

Financial Services

14.4%
55.1%

Energy

12.6%
0.9%

Basic Materials

6.0%
0.6%

Communication Services

2.1%
0.4%

Healthcare

2.1%
0.8%

Utilities

2.0%
0.2%

Real Estate

1.6%
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FLCH
25.5%
CN
5.4%

Technology

FLCH
16.8%
CN
0.3%

Industrials

FLCH
15.5%
CN
1.0%

Financial Services

FLCH
14.4%
CN
55.1%

Energy

FLCH
12.6%
CN
0.9%

Basic Materials

FLCH
6.0%
CN
0.6%

Communication Services

FLCH
2.1%
CN
0.4%

Healthcare

FLCH
2.1%
CN
0.8%

Utilities

FLCH
2.0%
CN
0.2%

Real Estate

FLCH
1.6%
CN
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

FLCH
1.2%
CN
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLCH vs. CN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCH
FLCH Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FLCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCH Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCH Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

CN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCH vs. CN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLCHCNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.59

FLCH vs. CN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLCH vs. CN - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCHCNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.52%

Volatility

FLCH vs. CN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLCHCNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.86%

FLCH vs. CN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CN's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLCH vs. CN - Dividend Comparison

FLCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, while CN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CN
Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%4.04%1.80%2.00%0.78%4.18%2.09%0.81%11.41%14.00%
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
1.81%2.36%2.87%3.47%2.69%1.48%0.91%1.98%1.92%0.01%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLCH and CN have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLCH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLCH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CN.

FLCH has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 0.00% for CN.

FLCH tracks FTSE China RIC Capped Index, while CN tracks MSCI China All Shares. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLCH and 0.50% for CN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLCH and CN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer