FLCA vs. FLCH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FLCA (Franklin FTSE Canada ETF) and FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLCA is a Canada Equities fund tracking the FTSE Canada RIC Capped Index, while FLCH is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLCA returned 11.53%/yr vs -5.91%/yr for FLCH. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLCA charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLCH.

Performance

FLCA vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCA achieves a 7.29% return, which is significantly higher than FLCH's -12.17% return.

FLCA

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -0.97%
• YTD: 7.29%
• 6M: 6.20%
• 1Y: 27.89%
• 3Y*: 21.78%
• 5Y*: 11.53%
• 10Y*: —

FLCH

• 1D: -1.88%
• 1M: -5.67%
• YTD: -12.17%
• 6M: -12.94%
• 1Y: -0.05%
• 3Y*: 8.98%
• 5Y*: -5.91%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCA vs. FLCH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLCA Franklin FTSE Canada ETF	7.29%	34.62%	13.02%	14.71%	-11.93%	28.67%	6.31%	28.42%	-15.55%	2.65%
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	-12.17%	32.55%	18.00%	-11.21%	-22.74%	-20.87%	30.09%	24.32%	-19.52%	1.51%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCA and FLCH is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.47

FLCA vs. FLCH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLCA	FLCH
Financial Services	40.9%	14.4%
Energy	16.8%	12.6%
Basic Materials	14.9%	6.0%
Industrials	10.3%	15.5%
Technology	7.8%	16.8%
Consumer Cyclical	3.3%	25.5%
Consumer Defensive	3.0%	1.2%
Utilities	2.2%	2.0%
Communication Services	0.5%	2.1%
Real Estate	0.2%	1.6%
Healthcare	-	2.1%

Return for Risk

FLCA vs. FLCH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCA

FLCA Risk / Return Rank: 64
FLCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FLCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FLCA Omega Ratio Rank: 58
FLCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FLCA Martin Ratio Rank: 74

FLCH

FLCH Risk / Return Rank: 9
FLCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
FLCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
FLCH Omega Ratio Rank: 8
FLCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
FLCH Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCA vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLCA	FLCH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.95	-0.00	+1.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	0.13	+2.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.02	+0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.28	-0.00	+3.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.08	-0.01	+13.09

FLCA vs. FLCH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCA Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the FLCH Sharpe Ratio of -0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCA and FLCH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLCA vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCA drawdown since its inception was -41.51%, smaller than the maximum FLCH drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCA and FLCH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLCA	FLCH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.51%	-62.09%	+20.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.55%	-19.59%	+11.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.58%	-25.43%	+12.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.23%	-55.78%	+31.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.61%	-38.09%	+35.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.88%	-30.55%	+24.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.14%	8.32%	-6.18%

Volatility

FLCA vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) is 4.45%, while Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) has a volatility of 5.65%. This indicates that FLCA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLCA	FLCH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.45%	5.65%	-1.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.54%	14.07%	-2.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.35%	19.43%	-5.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.77%	29.63%	-12.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.03%	27.86%	-8.83%

FLCA vs. FLCH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCA has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FLCH's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FLCA vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison

FLCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than FLCH's 1.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLCA Franklin FTSE Canada ETF	1.02%	1.85%	2.50%	2.49%	2.20%	2.02%	2.49%	2.29%	3.03%	0.09%
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	1.77%	2.36%	2.87%	3.47%	2.69%	1.48%	0.91%	1.98%	1.92%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLCA and FLCH in my portfolio?

FLCA and FLCH have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLCA or FLCH?

FLCH has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to FLCA (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCA dropped -41.51% vs FLCH's -62.09%.

Which ETF is better, FLCA or FLCH?

On 5-year performance, FLCA leads with 11.53% vs -5.91% for FLCH. On fees, FLCA is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLCA has been the lower-risk option at 4.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLCA or FLCH?

Over the 5-year period, FLCA has performed better with a 11.53% return vs -5.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLCA or FLCH?

FLCA is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLCH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLCA or FLCH?

FLCH has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.02% for FLCA.

What is the main difference between FLCA and FLCH?

FLCA is categorized as Canada Equities, while FLCH is China Equities. FLCA tracks FTSE Canada RIC Capped Index, while FLCH tracks FTSE China RIC Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLCA and 0.19% for FLCH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLCA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.