PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCA vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLCA vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCA achieves a 8.49% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.01% return.


FLCA

1D
-1.52%
1M
1.39%
YTD
8.49%
6M
12.58%
1Y
29.71%
3Y*
21.86%
5Y*
11.65%
10Y*

SCHD

1D
0.00%
1M
2.70%
YTD
19.01%
6M
18.63%
1Y
27.16%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCA vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLCA
Franklin FTSE Canada ETF
8.49%34.62%13.02%14.71%-11.93%28.67%6.31%28.42%-15.55%2.49%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
19.01%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%5.96%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCA and SCHD is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between FLCA and SCHD has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FLCA vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLCA
SCHD

Financial Services

39.0%
9.3%

Energy

18.0%
16.2%

Basic Materials

15.7%
1.2%

Industrials

10.4%
7.5%

Technology

7.6%
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

3.3%
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
19.2%

Utilities

2.3%
0.0%

Communication Services

0.5%
6.3%

Real Estate

0.2%

-

Healthcare

-

18.8%

Financial Services

FLCA
39.0%
SCHD
9.3%

Energy

FLCA
18.0%
SCHD
16.2%

Basic Materials

FLCA
15.7%
SCHD
1.2%

Industrials

FLCA
10.4%
SCHD
7.5%

Technology

FLCA
7.6%
SCHD
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FLCA
3.3%
SCHD
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

FLCA
2.9%
SCHD
19.2%

Utilities

FLCA
2.3%
SCHD
0.0%

Communication Services

FLCA
0.5%
SCHD
6.3%

Real Estate

FLCA
0.2%
SCHD

-

Healthcare

FLCA

-

SCHD
18.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLCA vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCA
FLCA Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FLCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCA Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCA vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLCASCHDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.14

2.49

-0.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.83

3.87

-1.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.45

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.49

5.91

-2.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.25

14.53

-0.28

FLCA vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCA Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCA and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLCASCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

2.49

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.58

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.86

-0.26

Drawdowns

FLCA vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCA drawdown since its inception was -41.51%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCA and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCASCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.51%

-33.37%

-8.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.55%

-4.61%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.58%

-16.13%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.23%

-16.85%

-7.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.52%

-1.40%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.91%

-3.32%

-2.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

1.88%

+0.21%

Volatility

FLCA vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) has a higher volatility of 3.50% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.66%. This indicates that FLCA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLCASCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.50%

2.66%

+0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.15%

7.66%

+3.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.94%

10.96%

+2.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.71%

14.38%

+2.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.04%

16.72%

+2.32%

FLCA vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCA has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLCA vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

FLCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than SCHD's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLCA
Franklin FTSE Canada ETF
1.71%1.85%2.50%2.49%2.20%2.02%2.49%2.29%3.03%0.09%0.00%0.00%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.26%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLCA and SCHD have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLCA has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to SCHD (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCA dropped -41.51% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 5-year performance, FLCA leads with 11.65% vs 8.36% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLCA has performed better with a 11.65% return vs 8.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for FLCA.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 1.71% for FLCA.

FLCA is categorized as Canada Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. FLCA tracks FTSE Canada RIC Capped Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLCA and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLCA and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer