PortfoliosLab logo
FLCA vs. ABT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FLCA and ABT is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

FLCA vs. ABT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FLCA:

1.41

ABT:

1.66

Sortino Ratio

FLCA:

1.75

ABT:

2.11

Omega Ratio

FLCA:

1.24

ABT:

1.27

Calmar Ratio

FLCA:

1.63

ABT:

1.19

Martin Ratio

FLCA:

6.61

ABT:

7.04

Ulcer Index

FLCA:

3.11%

ABT:

4.31%

Daily Std Dev

FLCA:

16.91%

ABT:

20.99%

Max Drawdown

FLCA:

-41.51%

ABT:

-45.66%

Current Drawdown

FLCA:

-0.10%

ABT:

-4.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCA achieves a 11.07% return, which is significantly lower than ABT's 18.62% return.


FLCA

YTD

11.07%

1M

5.15%

6M

5.55%

1Y

23.41%

3Y*

8.97%

5Y*

15.26%

10Y*

N/A

ABT

YTD

18.62%

1M

1.80%

6M

12.79%

1Y

34.54%

3Y*

6.48%

5Y*

8.87%

10Y*

12.62%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Franklin FTSE Canada ETF

Abbott Laboratories

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLCA vs. ABT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLCA is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLCA is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLCA is 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLCA is 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLCA is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLCA is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

ABT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ABT is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ABT is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ABT is 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ABT is 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ABT is 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ABT is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FLCA vs. ABT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FLCA Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the ABT Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCA and ABT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FLCA vs. ABT - Dividend Comparison

FLCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than ABT's 1.72% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FLCA
Franklin FTSE Canada ETF
2.25%2.50%2.49%2.20%2.03%2.50%2.29%3.02%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ABT
Abbott Laboratories
1.72%1.95%1.85%1.71%1.28%1.32%1.47%1.55%1.86%2.71%2.14%1.95%

Drawdowns

FLCA vs. ABT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCA drawdown since its inception was -41.51%, smaller than the maximum ABT drawdown of -45.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCA and ABT.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FLCA vs. ABT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) is 2.24%, while Abbott Laboratories (ABT) has a volatility of 5.65%. This indicates that FLCA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...