FLCA vs. BBCA
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA).
FLCA and BBCA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLCA is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Canada RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. BBCA is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan Chase that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Canada Target Market Exposure Index. It was launched on Aug 7, 2018. Both FLCA and BBCA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FLCA or BBCA.
Key characteristics
| FLCA | BBCA | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 16.28% | 16.50% |
| 1Y Return | 31.14% | 31.08% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.07% | 4.76% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.62% | 10.46% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.32 | 2.30 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.17 | 3.15 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.41 | 1.40 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.00 | 1.98 |
| Martin Ratio | 16.30 | 16.79 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.89% | 1.82% |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.29% | 13.29% |
| Max Drawdown | -41.51% | -42.81% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLCA and BBCA is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FLCA vs. BBCA - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FLCA having a 16.28% return and BBCA slightly higher at 16.50%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLCA vs. BBCA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLCA has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than BBCA's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FLCA vs. BBCA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FLCA vs. BBCA - Dividend Comparison
FLCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, more than BBCA's 2.26% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCA Franklin FTSE Canada ETF | 2.32% | 2.49% | 2.20% | 2.03% | 2.50% | 2.29% | 3.02% | 0.09% |
BBCA JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF | 2.26% | 2.51% | 2.65% | 2.17% | 2.40% | 2.32% | 1.21% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FLCA vs. BBCA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLCA drawdown since its inception was -41.51%, roughly equal to the maximum BBCA drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCA and BBCA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FLCA vs. BBCA - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA) have volatilities of 3.14% and 3.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.