PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLBR vs. LVHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLBR vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR) and Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLBR achieves a 15.72% return, which is significantly higher than LVHD's 7.25% return.


FLBR

1D
0.52%
1M
-11.50%
YTD
15.72%
6M
9.48%
1Y
36.99%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
5.65%
10Y*

LVHD

1D
0.50%
1M
-1.09%
YTD
7.25%
6M
7.40%
1Y
10.89%
3Y*
9.64%
5Y*
6.16%
10Y*
8.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLBR vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLBR
Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF
15.72%45.57%-27.58%33.19%10.44%-16.78%-20.13%28.47%-2.13%2.27%
LVHD
Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
7.25%7.50%10.18%-0.95%-1.82%26.90%-1.28%22.91%-5.58%4.28%

Correlation

The correlation between FLBR and LVHD is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.35

FLBR vs. LVHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLBR
LVHD

Financial Services

28.0%
8.6%

Energy

19.4%
6.7%

Basic Materials

15.9%

-

Utilities

14.7%
25.5%

Industrials

7.8%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
18.5%

Healthcare

2.7%
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

2.4%
6.8%

Communication Services

1.8%
3.8%

Real Estate

0.8%
15.0%

Technology

0.7%
5.9%

Financial Services

FLBR
28.0%
LVHD
8.6%

Energy

FLBR
19.4%
LVHD
6.7%

Basic Materials

FLBR
15.9%
LVHD

-

Utilities

FLBR
14.7%
LVHD
25.5%

Industrials

FLBR
7.8%
LVHD
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

FLBR
4.5%
LVHD
18.5%

Healthcare

FLBR
2.7%
LVHD
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FLBR
2.4%
LVHD
6.8%

Communication Services

FLBR
1.8%
LVHD
3.8%

Real Estate

FLBR
0.8%
LVHD
15.0%

Technology

FLBR
0.7%
LVHD
5.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLBR vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLBR
FLBR Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
FLBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLBR Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FLBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLBR Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

LVHD
LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLBR vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR) and Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLBRLVHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.20

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

1.77

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.17

4.49

+2.68

FLBR vs. LVHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLBR Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the LVHD Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLBR and LVHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLBRLVHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

1.15

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.48

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.57

-0.41

Drawdowns

FLBR vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLBR drawdown since its inception was -57.42%, which is greater than LVHD's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLBR and LVHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLBRLVHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.42%

-37.32%

-20.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.85%

-6.17%

-9.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.97%

-14.29%

-14.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.74%

-16.75%

-15.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.41%

-4.37%

-11.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.62%

-4.05%

-14.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.17%

2.43%

+2.74%

Volatility

FLBR vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR) has a higher volatility of 7.85% compared to Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) at 2.89%. This indicates that FLBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLBRLVHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.85%

2.89%

+4.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.14%

6.61%

+14.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.06%

9.53%

+15.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.68%

12.87%

+14.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.08%

15.50%

+17.58%

FLBR vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLBR has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLBR vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison

FLBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.66%, more than LVHD's 3.39% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLBR
Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF
6.66%7.71%7.68%8.84%11.99%8.71%2.32%3.42%3.72%0.42%0.00%
LVHD
Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
3.39%3.35%4.23%3.55%3.30%2.56%3.27%3.30%3.82%3.33%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLBR and LVHD have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLBR has higher volatility (7.85%) compared to LVHD (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLBR dropped -57.42% vs LVHD's -37.32%.

On 5-year performance, LVHD leads with 6.16% vs 5.65% for FLBR. On fees, FLBR is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, LVHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LVHD has performed better with a 6.16% return vs 5.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLBR is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for LVHD.

FLBR has the higher dividend yield at 6.66%, compared with 3.39% for LVHD.

FLBR is categorized as Latin America Equities, while LVHD is Volatility Hedged Equity. FLBR tracks FTSE Brazil RIC Capped Index, while LVHD tracks QS Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLBR and 0.27% for LVHD.

FLBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLBR and LVHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer