FLBR vs. FLLA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FLBR (Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF) and FLLA (Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF) are both Latin America Equities funds from Franklin Templeton - FLBR tracks the FTSE Brazil RIC Capped Index while FLLA tracks the FTSE Latin America RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLBR returned 4.58%/yr vs 7.11%/yr for FLLA. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.19% expense ratio.

Performance

FLBR vs. FLLA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR) and Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLBR achieves a 12.86% return, which is significantly higher than FLLA's 11.00% return.

FLBR

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: -5.91%
• YTD: 12.86%
• 6M: 14.02%
• 1Y: 30.42%
• 3Y*: 9.76%
• 5Y*: 4.58%
• 10Y*: —

FLLA

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: -3.75%
• YTD: 11.00%
• 6M: 11.02%
• 1Y: 32.83%
• 3Y*: 11.05%
• 5Y*: 7.11%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLBR vs. FLLA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FLBR Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF	12.86%	45.57%	-27.58%	33.19%	10.44%	-16.78%	-20.13%	28.47%	1.81%
FLLA Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF	11.00%	51.81%	-26.89%	32.71%	7.78%	-8.93%	-15.08%	19.59%	-2.78%

Correlation

The correlation between FLBR and FLLA is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2018	0.93

The correlation between FLBR and FLLA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLBR vs. FLLA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLBR	FLLA
Financial Services	25.6%	24.4%
Energy	19.3%	11.7%
Basic Materials	16.5%	20.1%
Utilities	13.7%	9.0%
Industrials	11.6%	11.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	11.4%
Healthcare	2.8%	1.6%
Consumer Cyclical	2.6%	2.9%
Communication Services	1.9%	3.9%
Real Estate	0.8%	3.1%
Technology	0.8%	0.4%

Return for Risk

FLBR vs. FLLA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLBR

FLBR Risk / Return Rank: 34
FLBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
FLBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
FLBR Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FLBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
FLBR Martin Ratio Rank: 33

FLLA

FLLA Risk / Return Rank: 45
FLLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
FLLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
FLLA Omega Ratio Rank: 43
FLLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
FLLA Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLBR vs. FLLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR) and Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLBR	FLLA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	1.52	-0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.71	2.08	-0.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.27	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.66	2.40	-0.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.78	6.79	-2.02

FLBR vs. FLLA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLBR Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the FLLA Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLBR and FLLA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLBR vs. FLLA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLBR drawdown since its inception was -57.42%, which is greater than FLLA's maximum drawdown of -53.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLBR and FLLA.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLBR	FLLA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.42%	-53.88%	-3.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.38%	-13.75%	-4.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.97%	-27.76%	-1.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.31%	-28.32%	-3.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.50%	-12.25%	-5.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.60%	-13.46%	-5.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.38%	4.84%	+1.54%

Volatility

FLBR vs. FLLA - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR) has a higher volatility of 6.35% compared to Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA) at 5.89%. This indicates that FLBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLBR	FLLA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.35%	5.89%	+0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.04%	17.85%	+2.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.32%	21.71%	+3.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.73%	22.87%	+4.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.02%	27.49%	+5.53%

FLBR vs. FLLA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLBR and FLLA have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FLBR vs. FLLA - Dividend Comparison

FLBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.80%, more than FLLA's 3.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLBR Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF	4.80%	7.71%	7.68%	8.84%	11.99%	8.71%	2.32%	3.42%	3.72%	0.42%
FLLA Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF	3.49%	6.06%	7.04%	5.45%	9.55%	7.60%	2.12%	3.18%	0.48%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLBR and FLLA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, FLBR and FLLA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FLBR or FLLA?

FLBR has higher volatility (6.35%) compared to FLLA (5.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLBR dropped -57.42% vs FLLA's -53.88%.

Which ETF is better, FLBR or FLLA?

On 5-year performance, FLLA leads with 7.11% vs 4.58% for FLBR. Both ETFs have the same 0.19% expense ratio. On volatility, FLLA has been the lower-risk option at 5.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLBR or FLLA?

Over the 5-year period, FLLA has performed better with a 7.11% return vs 4.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLBR or FLLA?

FLBR and FLLA have the same expense ratio: 0.19% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLBR or FLLA?

FLBR has the higher dividend yield at 4.80%, compared with 3.49% for FLLA.

What is the main difference between FLBR and FLLA?

FLBR tracks FTSE Brazil RIC Capped Index, while FLLA tracks FTSE Latin America RIC Capped Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.