IPAC vs. IVAL

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

IPAC (iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF) and IVAL (Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IPAC is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Pacific IMI Index (Net), while IVAL is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. IPAC is passively managed, while IVAL is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, IPAC returned 8.74%/yr vs 8.04%/yr for IVAL. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IPAC charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IVAL.

Performance

IPAC vs. IVAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) and Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPAC achieves a 14.72% return, which is significantly lower than IVAL's 17.08% return. Over the past 10 years, IPAC has outperformed IVAL with an annualized return of 8.74%, while IVAL has yielded a comparatively lower 8.04% annualized return.

IPAC

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 1.29%
• 6M: 8.01%
• YTD: 14.72%
• 1Y: 26.59%
• 3Y*: 17.08%
• 5Y*: 8.32%
• 10Y*: 8.74%
• ALL TIME*: 7.34%

IVAL

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 4.41%
• 6M: 9.03%
• YTD: 17.08%
• 1Y: 34.42%
• 3Y*: 18.47%
• 5Y*: 10.00%
• 10Y*: 8.04%
• ALL TIME*: 6.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IPAC iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF	$5.66M	$6.34M	$8.56M
IVAL Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF	$649.80K	$495.52K	$667.53K

IPAC vs. IVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IPAC iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF	14.72%	25.16%	6.18%	14.51%	-13.68%	3.09%	12.39%	19.44%	-12.78%	25.97%
IVAL Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF	17.08%	34.92%	-0.71%	20.61%	-10.06%	-0.22%	-4.94%	21.26%	-22.50%	31.03%

Correlation

The correlation between IPAC and IVAL is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.84
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2014	0.82

The correlation between IPAC and IVAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

IPAC vs. IVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IPAC	IVAL
Financial Services	24.9%	-
Industrials	20.5%	22.0%
Technology	13.7%	6.1%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	21.7%
Basic Materials	8.3%	17.9%
Healthcare	5.4%	4.1%
Real Estate	5.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.0%	10.2%
Communication Services	3.8%	4.0%
Energy	1.7%	14.2%
Utilities	1.6%	-

Return for Risk

IPAC vs. IVAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IPAC

IPAC Risk / Return Rank: 64
IPAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
IPAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
IPAC Omega Ratio Rank: 64
IPAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
IPAC Martin Ratio Rank: 65

IVAL

IVAL Risk / Return Rank: 84
IVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
IVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
IVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 87
IVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
IVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IPAC vs. IVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) and Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IPAC	IVAL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	2.23	-0.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.15	3.07	-0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.40	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.32	3.08	-0.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.11	10.02	-1.91

IPAC vs. IVAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPAC Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the IVAL Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPAC and IVAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IPAC vs. IVAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPAC drawdown since its inception was -30.99%, smaller than the maximum IVAL drawdown of -46.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPAC and IVAL.

Drawdown Indicators

	IPAC	IVAL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.99%	-46.09%	+15.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.49%	-11.24%	-0.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.45%	-14.92%	-0.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.64%	-28.51%	-1.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.99%	-46.09%	+15.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.29%	-1.84%	+0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.41%	-11.88%	+4.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.29%	3.44%	-0.15%

Volatility

IPAC vs. IVAL - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) has a higher volatility of 5.93% compared to Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) at 4.44%. This indicates that IPAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IPAC	IVAL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.93%	4.44%	+1.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.91%	12.92%	+1.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.60%	15.53%	+2.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.89%	17.78%	-0.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.65%	18.60%	-1.95%

IPAC vs. IVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPAC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IVAL's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

IPAC vs. IVAL - Dividend Comparison

IPAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, more than IVAL's 2.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IPAC iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF	3.85%	4.32%	3.43%	3.16%	2.76%	4.03%	1.68%	3.37%	2.95%	2.98%	2.66%	2.60%
IVAL Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF	2.60%	2.75%	3.60%	5.15%	8.00%	3.95%	2.07%	2.51%	2.93%	1.73%	2.02%	1.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IPAC and IVAL in my portfolio?

IPAC and IVAL have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IPAC or IVAL?

IPAC has higher volatility (5.93%) compared to IVAL (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPAC dropped -30.99% vs IVAL's -46.09%.

Which ETF is better, IPAC or IVAL?

On 10-year performance, IPAC leads with 8.74% vs 8.04% for IVAL. On fees, IPAC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IVAL has been the lower-risk option at 4.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IPAC or IVAL?

Over the 10-year period, IPAC has performed better with a 8.74% return vs 8.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IPAC or IVAL?

IPAC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IVAL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IPAC or IVAL?

IPAC has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 2.60% for IVAL.

What is the main difference between IPAC and IVAL?

IPAC is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while IVAL is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IPAC and 0.39% for IVAL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.