PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLAX vs. VXUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLAX vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLAX achieves a 29.31% return, which is significantly higher than VXUS's 14.25% return.


FLAX

1D
-1.11%
1M
10.05%
YTD
29.31%
6M
32.11%
1Y
58.93%
3Y*
25.00%
5Y*
7.95%
10Y*

VXUS

1D
-0.99%
1M
4.68%
YTD
14.25%
6M
16.92%
1Y
32.01%
3Y*
19.30%
5Y*
8.46%
10Y*
9.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLAX vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FLAX
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
29.31%33.72%9.82%6.27%-18.88%-3.54%24.17%17.19%-12.02%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
14.25%32.35%5.08%15.86%-16.08%8.98%10.66%21.75%-11.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FLAX and VXUS is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2018

0.82

The correlation between FLAX and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLAX vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLAX
VXUS

Technology

39.7%
18.1%

Financial Services

17.2%
22.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
8.4%

Industrials

9.2%
16.1%

Communication Services

6.5%
4.4%

Basic Materials

4.2%
7.6%

Healthcare

3.3%
7.1%

Energy

3.0%
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
5.0%

Utilities

2.1%
3.2%

Real Estate

2.0%
2.6%

Technology

FLAX
39.7%
VXUS
18.1%

Financial Services

FLAX
17.2%
VXUS
22.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FLAX
10.2%
VXUS
8.4%

Industrials

FLAX
9.2%
VXUS
16.1%

Communication Services

FLAX
6.5%
VXUS
4.4%

Basic Materials

FLAX
4.2%
VXUS
7.6%

Healthcare

FLAX
3.3%
VXUS
7.1%

Energy

FLAX
3.0%
VXUS
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

FLAX
2.8%
VXUS
5.0%

Utilities

FLAX
2.1%
VXUS
3.2%

Real Estate

FLAX
2.0%
VXUS
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLAX vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLAX
FLAX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

VXUS
VXUS Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLAX vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLAXVXUSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.11

2.12

+0.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.06

2.90

+1.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.39

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.56

2.85

+1.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.96

11.14

+6.82

FLAX vs. VXUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.11, which is higher than the VXUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLAX and VXUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLAXVXUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.11

2.12

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.53

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.39

+0.06

Drawdowns

FLAX vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLAX drawdown since its inception was -42.51%, which is greater than VXUS's maximum drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLAX and VXUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLAXVXUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.51%

-35.97%

-6.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.99%

-11.27%

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.29%

-13.58%

-5.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.75%

-29.44%

-9.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-0.99%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.41%

-8.22%

-7.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.29%

2.88%

+0.41%

Volatility

FLAX vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) has a higher volatility of 8.58% compared to Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) at 5.60%. This indicates that FLAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLAXVXUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.58%

5.60%

+2.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.54%

13.00%

+3.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.07%

15.21%

+3.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.02%

16.05%

+2.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.93%

17.16%

+2.77%

FLAX vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLAX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLAX vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison

FLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than VXUS's 2.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLAX
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
1.83%2.37%3.12%2.20%2.86%2.38%1.57%2.23%2.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
2.66%3.18%3.37%3.24%3.09%3.10%2.14%3.06%3.18%2.73%2.93%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLAX and VXUS have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLAX has higher volatility (8.58%) compared to VXUS (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLAX dropped -42.51% vs VXUS's -35.97%.

On 5-year performance, VXUS leads with 8.46% vs 7.95% for FLAX. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VXUS has been the lower-risk option at 5.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VXUS has performed better with a 8.46% return vs 7.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLAX.

VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 1.83% for FLAX.

FLAX is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while VXUS is Global Equities. FLAX tracks FTSE Asia ex Japan RIC Capped Index, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLAX and 0.05% for VXUS.

FLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLAX and VXUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer