IPAC vs. VPL
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) and Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL).
IPAC and VPL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IPAC is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Pacific Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jun 10, 2014. VPL is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific Index. It was launched on Mar 4, 2005. Both IPAC and VPL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IPAC or VPL.
Key characteristics
| IPAC | VPL | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 10.31% | 7.89% |
| 1Y Return | 15.75% | 13.50% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 0.98% | -0.01% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 5.92% | 5.88% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 5.53% | 5.20% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.00 | 0.86 |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.16% | 15.21% |
| Max Drawdown | -30.99% | -55.49% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.41% | -1.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between IPAC and VPL is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IPAC vs. VPL - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IPAC achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly higher than VPL's 7.89% return. Over the past 10 years, IPAC has outperformed VPL with an annualized return of 5.53%, while VPL has yielded a comparatively lower 5.20% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IPAC vs. VPL - Expense Ratio Comparison
IPAC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VPL's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IPAC vs. VPL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) and Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IPAC vs. VPL - Dividend Comparison
IPAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, more than VPL's 2.68% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPAC iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF | 2.95% | 3.16% | 2.76% | 4.03% | 1.68% | 3.37% | 2.95% | 2.98% | 2.66% | 2.60% | 0.96% | 0.00% |
VPL Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF | 2.68% | 3.12% | 2.75% | 3.19% | 1.81% | 2.84% | 3.06% | 2.57% | 2.65% | 2.43% | 2.69% | 2.49% |
Drawdowns
IPAC vs. VPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPAC drawdown since its inception was -30.99%, smaller than the maximum VPL drawdown of -55.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPAC and VPL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IPAC vs. VPL - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) and Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) have volatilities of 5.29% and 5.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.