FKUQX vs. FKDNX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Utilities Fund Class A (FKUQX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX).

FKUQX is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Sep 30, 1948. FKDNX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jan 2, 1968.

Performance

FKUQX vs. FKDNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Utilities Fund Class A (FKUQX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FKUQX vs. FKDNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FKUQX Franklin Utilities Fund Class A	9.81%	14.51%	27.00%	-5.00%	1.57%	17.88%	-2.21%	29.45%	-5.13%
FKDNX Franklin DynaTech Fund	-10.96%	18.59%	30.57%	44.42%	-40.30%	12.53%	57.68%	36.36%	-9.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKUQX achieves a 9.81% return, which is significantly higher than FKDNX's -10.96% return.

FKUQX

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: -2.30%
• YTD: 9.81%
• 6M: 7.87%
• 1Y: 20.75%
• 3Y*: 15.57%
• 5Y*: 11.96%
• 10Y*: —

FKDNX

• 1D: 5.05%
• 1M: -5.14%
• YTD: -10.96%
• 6M: -11.72%
• 1Y: 19.43%
• 3Y*: 19.19%
• 5Y*: 5.93%
• 10Y*: 15.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKUQX vs. FKDNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKUQX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than FKDNX's 0.79% expense ratio.

FKUQX

Franklin Utilities Fund Class A

FKDNX

Franklin DynaTech Fund

Return for Risk

FKUQX vs. FKDNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKUQX

FKUQX Risk / Return Rank: 71
FKUQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
FKUQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
FKUQX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
FKUQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FKUQX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

FKDNX

FKDNX Risk / Return Rank: 31
FKDNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
FKDNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
FKDNX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FKDNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
FKDNX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKUQX vs. FKDNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Utilities Fund Class A (FKUQX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FKUQX	FKDNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	0.79	+0.63
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.90	1.29	+0.61
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.17	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.74	0.81	+1.93
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.54	2.63	+4.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FKUQX vs. FKDNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKUQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the FKDNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKUQX and FKDNX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FKUQX	FKDNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.42	0.79	+0.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	0.23	+0.49
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.64	-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between FKUQX and FKDNX is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FKUQX vs. FKDNX - Dividend Comparison

FKUQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, less than FKDNX's 12.54% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FKUQX Franklin Utilities Fund Class A	7.41%	7.63%	8.56%	6.36%	3.63%	4.87%	9.48%	5.94%	3.82%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FKDNX Franklin DynaTech Fund	12.54%	11.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.43%	0.00%	0.74%	2.92%	1.77%	3.55%	2.46%

Drawdowns

FKUQX vs. FKDNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKUQX drawdown since its inception was -36.53%, smaller than the maximum FKDNX drawdown of -51.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKUQX and FKDNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FKUQX	FKDNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.53%	-51.63%	+15.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.20%	-20.49%	+12.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.64%	-48.28%	+25.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-48.28%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.73%	-16.48%	+13.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.59%	-11.28%	+4.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.97%	6.29%	-3.32%

Volatility

FKUQX vs. FKDNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Utilities Fund Class A (FKUQX) is 5.16%, while Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) has a volatility of 9.29%. This indicates that FKUQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FKDNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FKUQX	FKDNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.16%	9.29%	-4.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.85%	16.81%	-6.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.11%	26.47%	-11.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.77%	26.27%	-9.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.60%	24.53%	-3.93%