FKUQX vs. ERH

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FKUQX (Franklin Utilities Fund Class A) and ERH (Allspring Utilities and High Income Fund) are both Utilities Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FKUQX returned 10.19%/yr vs 4.40%/yr for ERH. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FKUQX charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.93%/yr for ERH.

Performance

FKUQX vs. ERH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Utilities Fund Class A (FKUQX) and Allspring Utilities and High Income Fund (ERH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FKUQX having a 3.97% return and ERH slightly lower at 3.91%.

FKUQX

• 1D: -2.75%
• 1M: -6.82%
• YTD: 3.97%
• 6M: 2.48%
• 1Y: 10.95%
• 3Y*: 14.96%
• 5Y*: 10.19%
• 10Y*: —

ERH

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: -6.18%
• YTD: 3.91%
• 6M: 0.89%
• 1Y: 13.70%
• 3Y*: 14.55%
• 5Y*: 4.40%
• 10Y*: 6.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKUQX vs. ERH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FKUQX Franklin Utilities Fund Class A	3.97%	14.51%	27.00%	-5.00%	1.57%	17.88%	-2.21%	29.45%	-5.13%
ERH Allspring Utilities and High Income Fund	3.91%	19.85%	25.71%	-10.52%	-18.38%	22.14%	-1.15%	33.97%	-6.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FKUQX and ERH is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2018	0.59

The correlation between FKUQX and ERH shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.72 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FKUQX vs. ERH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKUQX

FKUQX Risk / Return Rank: 12
FKUQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
FKUQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
FKUQX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
FKUQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
FKUQX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

ERH

ERH Risk / Return Rank: 14
ERH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
ERH Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
ERH Omega Ratio Rank: 15
ERH Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
ERH Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKUQX vs. ERH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Utilities Fund Class A (FKUQX) and Allspring Utilities and High Income Fund (ERH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FKUQX	ERH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.81	1.08	-0.27
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.17	1.52	-0.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.20	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.51	1.43	+0.08
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.93	3.19	+0.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FKUQX vs. ERH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKUQX Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is comparable to the ERH Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKUQX and ERH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FKUQX	ERH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81	1.08	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	0.26	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.26	+0.23

Drawdowns

FKUQX vs. ERH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKUQX drawdown since its inception was -36.53%, smaller than the maximum ERH drawdown of -69.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKUQX and ERH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FKUQX	ERH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.53%	-69.81%	+33.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.10%	-9.36%	+1.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.38%	-21.24%	+4.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.64%	-37.85%	+15.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-46.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.10%	-6.55%	-1.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.51%	-17.30%	+10.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.12%	4.20%	-1.08%

Volatility

FKUQX vs. ERH - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Utilities Fund Class A (FKUQX) has a higher volatility of 4.88% compared to Allspring Utilities and High Income Fund (ERH) at 4.54%. This indicates that FKUQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ERH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FKUQX	ERH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.88%	4.54%	+0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.24%	10.17%	+1.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.90%	12.70%	+1.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.90%	16.87%	+0.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.53%	19.71%	+0.82%

FKUQX vs. ERH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKUQX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than ERH's 0.93% expense ratio.

Dividends

FKUQX vs. ERH - Dividend Comparison

FKUQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.83%, less than ERH's 8.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ERH Allspring Utilities and High Income Fund	8.44%	8.13%	7.15%	9.19%	8.09%	5.86%	7.20%	6.53%	8.06%	6.82%	7.53%	8.04%
FKUQX Franklin Utilities Fund Class A	7.83%	7.63%	8.56%	6.36%	3.63%	4.87%	9.48%	5.94%	3.82%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FKUQX and ERH in my portfolio?

FKUQX and ERH have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FKUQX or ERH?

FKUQX has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to ERH (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKUQX dropped -36.53% vs ERH's -69.81%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ERH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.