PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FKUQX vs. EVUAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FKUQX vs. EVUAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Utilities Fund Class A (FKUQX) and Allspring Utility and Telecommunications Fund (EVUAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKUQX achieves a 3.97% return, which is significantly higher than EVUAX's 1.92% return.


FKUQX

1D
-2.75%
1M
-6.82%
YTD
3.97%
6M
2.48%
1Y
10.95%
3Y*
14.96%
5Y*
10.19%
10Y*

EVUAX

1D
-2.82%
1M
-6.35%
YTD
1.92%
6M
-0.15%
1Y
8.32%
3Y*
11.85%
5Y*
6.50%
10Y*
10.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKUQX vs. EVUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FKUQX
Franklin Utilities Fund Class A
3.97%14.51%27.00%-5.00%1.57%17.88%-2.21%29.45%-5.13%
EVUAX
Allspring Utility and Telecommunications Fund
1.92%15.41%17.68%-5.17%-3.47%13.95%4.19%54.25%-6.35%

Correlation

The correlation between FKUQX and EVUAX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2018

0.96

The correlation between FKUQX and EVUAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FKUQX vs. EVUAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKUQX
FKUQX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
FKUQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKUQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKUQX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
FKUQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKUQX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

EVUAX
EVUAX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
EVUAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVUAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVUAX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
EVUAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVUAX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKUQX vs. EVUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Utilities Fund Class A (FKUQX) and Allspring Utility and Telecommunications Fund (EVUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FKUQXEVUAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.81

0.67

+0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.17

0.97

+0.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.12

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

1.28

+0.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.93

2.94

+1.00

FKUQX vs. EVUAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKUQX Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is comparable to the EVUAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKUQX and EVUAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FKUQXEVUAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

0.67

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.38

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.66

-0.17

Drawdowns

FKUQX vs. EVUAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKUQX drawdown since its inception was -36.53%, smaller than the maximum EVUAX drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKUQX and EVUAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FKUQXEVUAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.53%

-56.00%

+19.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.10%

-7.68%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.38%

-14.26%

-2.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.64%

-23.32%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.10%

-7.04%

-1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.51%

-9.57%

+3.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

3.34%

-0.22%

Volatility

FKUQX vs. EVUAX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Utilities Fund Class A (FKUQX) has a higher volatility of 4.88% compared to Allspring Utility and Telecommunications Fund (EVUAX) at 4.52%. This indicates that FKUQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FKUQXEVUAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.88%

4.52%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.24%

10.58%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.90%

13.04%

+0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.90%

17.13%

-0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.53%

19.10%

+1.43%

FKUQX vs. EVUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKUQX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than EVUAX's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FKUQX vs. EVUAX - Dividend Comparison

FKUQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.83%, more than EVUAX's 5.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EVUAX
Allspring Utility and Telecommunications Fund
5.94%6.17%4.70%5.76%11.09%13.01%13.60%35.11%1.96%1.75%1.34%1.95%
FKUQX
Franklin Utilities Fund Class A
7.83%7.63%8.56%6.36%3.63%4.87%9.48%5.94%3.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FKUQX and EVUAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FKUQX has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to EVUAX (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKUQX dropped -36.53% vs EVUAX's -56.00%.

FKUQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FKUQX and EVUAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer