FITZ vs. RSMV

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FITZ (Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF) and RSMV (Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FITZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for RSMV.

Performance

FITZ vs. RSMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ) and Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FITZ

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RSMV

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 1.37%
• YTD: 7.52%
• 6M: 6.66%
• 1Y: 21.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FITZ vs. RSMV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF	-5.35%
RSMV Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF	-0.14%

Correlation

The correlation between FITZ and RSMV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	0.82

Return for Risk

FITZ vs. RSMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FITZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RSMV

RSMV Risk / Return Rank: 60
RSMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
RSMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
RSMV Omega Ratio Rank: 55
RSMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
RSMV Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FITZ vs. RSMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ) and Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FITZ	RSMV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.65	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.26	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.30	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.96	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.76	—

Drawdowns

FITZ vs. RSMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FITZ drawdown since its inception was -6.70%, smaller than the maximum RSMV drawdown of -17.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITZ and RSMV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FITZ	RSMV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.70%	-17.58%	+10.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.70%	-2.28%	-4.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.80%	-3.89%	+0.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.00%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FITZ	RSMV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.42%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.17%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.29%	13.11%	+4.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.29%	15.05%	+2.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.29%	15.05%	+2.24%

FITZ vs. RSMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FITZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than RSMV's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

FITZ vs. RSMV - Dividend Comparison

FITZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%.

Position	TTM	2025
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF	0.00%	0.00%
RSMV Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF	0.93%	1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FITZ and RSMV in my portfolio?

FITZ and RSMV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FITZ or RSMV?

On fees, FITZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FITZ or RSMV?

FITZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for RSMV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FITZ or RSMV?

RSMV has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.00% for FITZ.

What is the main difference between FITZ and RSMV?

They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and Teucrium. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FITZ and 0.95% for RSMV.