FITZ vs. GLDN
FITZ (Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF) and GLDN (Nicholas Gold Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FITZ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Nicholas, while GLDN is a Gold fund actively managed by Nicholas. Both are actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FITZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for GLDN.
Performance
FITZ vs. GLDN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FITZ
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLDN
- 1D
- -2.35%
- 1M
- -3.61%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FITZ vs. GLDN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF | -3.48% |
GLDN Nicholas Gold Income ETF | -4.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between FITZ and GLDN is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FITZ vs. GLDN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ) and Nicholas Gold Income ETF (GLDN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FITZ vs. GLDN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FITZ drawdown since its inception was -6.62%, smaller than the maximum GLDN drawdown of -33.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITZ and GLDN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FITZ | GLDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.62% | -33.32% | +26.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.84% | -26.72% | +21.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.40% | -16.79% | +13.39% |
Volatility
FITZ vs. GLDN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FITZ | GLDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.67% | 43.21% | -24.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.67% | 43.21% | -24.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.67% | 43.21% | -24.54% |
FITZ vs. GLDN - Expense Ratio Comparison
FITZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDN's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
FITZ vs. GLDN - Dividend Comparison
FITZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF | 0.00% |
GLDN Nicholas Gold Income ETF | 4.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FITZ and GLDN have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FITZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FITZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for GLDN.
GLDN has the higher dividend yield at 4.93%, compared with 0.00% for FITZ.
FITZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GLDN is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FITZ and 1.07% for GLDN.
Find the right allocation for FITZ and GLDN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer