PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FITZ vs. GLDN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FITZ vs. GLDN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ) and Nicholas Gold Income ETF (GLDN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FITZ

1D
0.21%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GLDN

1D
-2.35%
1M
-3.61%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FITZ vs. GLDN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FITZ and GLDN is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026

0.70

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FITZ vs. GLDN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ) and Nicholas Gold Income ETF (GLDN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FITZ vs. GLDN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FITZ vs. GLDN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FITZ drawdown since its inception was -6.62%, smaller than the maximum GLDN drawdown of -33.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITZ and GLDN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FITZGLDNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.62%

-33.32%

+26.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.84%

-26.72%

+21.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.40%

-16.79%

+13.39%

Volatility

FITZ vs. GLDN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FITZGLDNDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.67%

43.21%

-24.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.67%

43.21%

-24.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.67%

43.21%

-24.54%

FITZ vs. GLDN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FITZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDN's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

FITZ vs. GLDN - Dividend Comparison

FITZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FITZ and GLDN have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FITZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FITZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for GLDN.

GLDN has the higher dividend yield at 4.93%, compared with 0.00% for FITZ.

FITZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GLDN is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FITZ and 1.07% for GLDN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FITZ and GLDN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer