FITZ vs. MEME
FITZ (Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF) and MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FITZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for MEME.
Performance
FITZ vs. MEME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FITZ
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MEME
- 1D
- -5.29%
- 1M
- 25.28%
- YTD
- 79.03%
- 6M
- 68.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FITZ vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF | -1.46% |
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF | -5.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between FITZ and MEME is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FITZ vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FITZ | MEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -6.98 | 0.28 | -7.27 |
Drawdowns
FITZ vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FITZ drawdown since its inception was -1.77%, smaller than the maximum MEME drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITZ and MEME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FITZ | MEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.77% | -48.78% | +47.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.77% | -5.93% | +4.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.86% | -29.90% | +29.04% |
Volatility
FITZ vs. MEME - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FITZ | MEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.00% | 74.19% | -64.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.00% | 74.19% | -64.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.00% | 74.19% | -64.19% |
FITZ vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison
FITZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
FITZ vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison
Neither FITZ nor MEME has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FITZ and MEME have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MEME is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MEME is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FITZ.
FITZ and MEME have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FITZ and 0.69% for MEME.
Find the right allocation for FITZ and MEME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer