CLCG vs. AVUS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CLCG (Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF) and AVUS (Avantis U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CLCG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Crossmark, while AVUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by American Century. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CLCG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AVUS.

Performance

CLCG vs. AVUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF (CLCG) and Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLCG achieves a 8.90% return, which is significantly lower than AVUS's 14.42% return.

CLCG

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: 6.27%
• YTD: 8.90%
• 6M: 8.68%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AVUS

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: 4.77%
• YTD: 14.42%
• 6M: 14.71%
• 1Y: 32.34%
• 3Y*: 22.35%
• 5Y*: 13.04%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLCG vs. AVUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CLCG Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF	8.90%	7.85%
AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF	14.42%	8.24%

Correlation

The correlation between CLCG and AVUS is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.81

Return for Risk

CLCG vs. AVUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVUS

AVUS Risk / Return Rank: 81
AVUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
AVUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
AVUS Omega Ratio Rank: 79
AVUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
AVUS Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLCG vs. AVUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF (CLCG) and Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLCG	AVUS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.76	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.20	0.80	+0.41

Drawdowns

CLCG vs. AVUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLCG drawdown since its inception was -16.32%, smaller than the maximum AVUS drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLCG and AVUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLCG	AVUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.32%	-37.04%	+20.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.85%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.74%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.32%	-0.46%	-0.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.84%	-5.09%	+1.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.72%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CLCG	AVUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.98%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.00%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.10%	12.15%	+4.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.10%	17.29%	-0.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.10%	20.85%	-3.75%

CLCG vs. AVUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLCG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUS's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLCG vs. AVUS - Dividend Comparison

CLCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than AVUS's 0.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF	0.91%	1.08%	1.27%	1.41%	1.59%	1.08%	1.19%	0.35%
CLCG Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF	0.06%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLCG and AVUS in my portfolio?

CLCG and AVUS have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CLCG or AVUS?

On fees, AVUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLCG or AVUS?

AVUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CLCG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLCG or AVUS?

AVUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.06% for CLCG.

What is the main difference between CLCG and AVUS?

CLCG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AVUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Crossmark and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CLCG and 0.15% for AVUS.