CLCG vs. AVUS

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

CLCG (Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF) and AVUS (Avantis U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CLCG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Crossmark, while AVUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CLCG returned 15.92% vs 28.84% for AVUS. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CLCG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AVUS.

Performance

CLCG vs. AVUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF (CLCG) and Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLCG achieves a 7.87% return, which is significantly lower than AVUS's 17.60% return.

CLCG

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 0.86%
• 6M: 13.10%
• YTD: 7.87%
• 1Y: 15.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.33%

AVUS

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 2.26%
• 6M: 13.24%
• YTD: 17.60%
• 1Y: 28.84%
• 3Y*: 20.91%
• 5Y*: 13.06%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF	$33.98M	$38.08M	$43.26M
CLCG Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF	$113.61K	$65.85K	$73.45K

CLCG vs. AVUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CLCG Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF	7.87%	8.42%
AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF	17.60%	9.27%

Correlation

The correlation between CLCG and AVUS is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025	0.82

The correlation between CLCG and AVUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CLCG vs. AVUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CLCG

CLCG Risk / Return Rank: 30
CLCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
CLCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
CLCG Omega Ratio Rank: 29
CLCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
CLCG Martin Ratio Rank: 30

AVUS

AVUS Risk / Return Rank: 86
AVUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
AVUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
AVUS Omega Ratio Rank: 85
AVUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
AVUS Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CLCG vs. AVUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF (CLCG) and Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CLCG	AVUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	2.25	-1.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	3.08	-1.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.40	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.98	3.69	-2.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.98	16.28	-13.29

CLCG vs. AVUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLCG Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the AVUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLCG and AVUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CLCG vs. AVUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLCG drawdown since its inception was -16.32%, smaller than the maximum AVUS drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLCG and AVUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLCG	AVUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.32%	-37.04%	+20.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.32%	-7.85%	-8.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.74%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.25%	-0.39%	-1.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.91%	-4.99%	+1.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.35%	1.78%	+3.57%

Volatility

CLCG vs. AVUS - Volatility Comparison

Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF (CLCG) has a higher volatility of 5.78% compared to Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) at 3.84%. This indicates that CLCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLCG	AVUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.78%	3.84%	+1.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.21%	10.07%	+4.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.95%	12.90%	+5.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.88%	17.34%	+0.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.88%	20.71%	-2.83%

CLCG vs. AVUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLCG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUS's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLCG vs. AVUS - Dividend Comparison

CLCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than AVUS's 0.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF	0.91%	1.08%	1.27%	1.41%	1.59%	1.08%	1.19%	0.35%
CLCG Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF	0.06%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLCG and AVUS in my portfolio?

CLCG and AVUS have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CLCG or AVUS?

CLCG has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to AVUS (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLCG dropped -16.32% vs AVUS's -37.04%.

Which ETF is better, CLCG or AVUS?

On 1-year performance, AVUS leads with 28.84% vs 15.92% for CLCG. On fees, AVUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AVUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CLCG or AVUS?

Over the 1-year period, AVUS has performed better with a 28.84% return vs 15.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLCG or AVUS?

AVUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CLCG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLCG or AVUS?

AVUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.06% for CLCG.

What is the main difference between CLCG and AVUS?

CLCG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AVUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Crossmark and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CLCG and 0.15% for AVUS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.