PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLCG vs. CLCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLCG vs. CLCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF (CLCG) and Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF (CLCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLCG achieves a 8.90% return, which is significantly lower than CLCV's 13.65% return.


CLCG

1D
-1.26%
1M
6.27%
YTD
8.90%
6M
8.68%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CLCV

1D
-0.54%
1M
8.29%
YTD
13.65%
6M
16.11%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLCG vs. CLCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CLCG
Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF
8.90%7.85%
CLCV
Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF
13.65%4.88%

Correlation

The correlation between CLCG and CLCV is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

0.56

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLCG vs. CLCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF (CLCG) and Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF (CLCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CLCG vs. CLCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLCGCLCVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.20

1.88

-0.68

Drawdowns

CLCG vs. CLCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLCG drawdown since its inception was -16.32%, which is greater than CLCV's maximum drawdown of -6.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLCG and CLCV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLCGCLCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.32%

-6.94%

-9.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-0.54%

-0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.84%

-1.46%

-2.38%

Volatility

CLCG vs. CLCV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLCGCLCVDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.10%

12.03%

+5.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.10%

12.03%

+5.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.10%

12.03%

+5.07%

CLCG vs. CLCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CLCG and CLCV have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

CLCG vs. CLCV - Dividend Comparison

CLCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than CLCV's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM2025
CLCG
Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF
0.06%0.07%
CLCV
Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF
0.35%0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLCG and CLCV have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CLCG and CLCV have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

CLCV has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.06% for CLCG.

CLCG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while CLCV is Large Cap Value Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLCG and CLCV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer