PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIHBX vs. FKASX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIHBX vs. FKASX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX) and Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund (FKASX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIHBX achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly lower than FKASX's 10.45% return. Over the past 10 years, FIHBX has underperformed FKASX with an annualized return of 5.05%, while FKASX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.56% annualized return.


FIHBX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.60%
YTD
1.27%
6M
2.24%
1Y
6.62%
3Y*
8.32%
5Y*
3.49%
10Y*
5.05%

FKASX

1D
0.46%
1M
4.41%
YTD
10.45%
6M
11.65%
1Y
22.35%
3Y*
14.77%
5Y*
2.28%
10Y*
13.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIHBX vs. FKASX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIHBX
Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund
1.27%8.59%6.40%13.17%-12.64%3.92%5.99%15.01%-2.80%7.19%
FKASX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund
10.45%12.01%14.45%14.48%-31.40%2.57%43.41%33.44%7.30%37.87%

Correlation

The correlation between FIHBX and FKASX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2002

0.36

The correlation between FIHBX and FKASX shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.53 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIHBX vs. FKASX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIHBX
FIHBX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FIHBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIHBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIHBX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FIHBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIHBX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FKASX
FKASX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FKASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKASX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FKASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKASX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIHBX vs. FKASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX) and Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund (FKASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIHBXFKASXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.96

1.12

+0.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.46

1.73

+1.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.23

+0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

1.51

+1.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.30

6.28

+8.01

FIHBX vs. FKASX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIHBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the FKASX Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIHBX and FKASX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIHBXFKASXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

1.12

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.10

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.61

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.36

0.58

+0.78

Drawdowns

FIHBX vs. FKASX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIHBX drawdown since its inception was -31.05%, smaller than the maximum FKASX drawdown of -60.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIHBX and FKASX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIHBXFKASXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.05%

-60.21%

+29.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.45%

-14.88%

+12.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.60%

-26.19%

+22.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.35%

-44.51%

+28.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.67%

-44.86%

+23.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.24%

+2.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.30%

-12.68%

+10.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

3.57%

-3.11%

Volatility

FIHBX vs. FKASX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX) is 1.08%, while Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund (FKASX) has a volatility of 6.77%. This indicates that FIHBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FKASX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIHBXFKASXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.08%

6.77%

-5.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.74%

16.80%

-14.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.39%

20.05%

-16.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.19%

23.38%

-18.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.76%

22.36%

-16.60%

FIHBX vs. FKASX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIHBX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FKASX's 1.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIHBX vs. FKASX - Dividend Comparison

FIHBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.44%, less than FKASX's 18.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIHBX
Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund
6.44%6.29%5.94%5.93%4.58%4.25%5.14%5.79%6.24%5.55%5.75%6.46%
FKASX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund
18.74%20.70%11.82%0.15%0.00%8.40%0.12%0.21%6.36%6.50%0.76%8.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIHBX and FKASX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FKASX has higher volatility (6.77%) compared to FIHBX (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIHBX dropped -31.05% vs FKASX's -60.21%.

FIHBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIHBX and FKASX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer