FKASX vs. FCPGX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FKASX (Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund) and FCPGX (Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FKASX returned 13.51%/yr vs 14.72%/yr for FCPGX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FKASX charges 1.36%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for FCPGX.

Performance

FKASX vs. FCPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund (FKASX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKASX achieves a 9.95% return, which is significantly lower than FCPGX's 17.62% return. Over the past 10 years, FKASX has underperformed FCPGX with an annualized return of 13.51%, while FCPGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.72% annualized return.

FKASX

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 4.16%
• YTD: 9.95%
• 6M: 11.40%
• 1Y: 21.79%
• 3Y*: 14.59%
• 5Y*: 1.98%
• 10Y*: 13.51%

FCPGX

• 1D: -1.13%
• 1M: 3.11%
• YTD: 17.62%
• 6M: 17.45%
• 1Y: 38.80%
• 3Y*: 20.50%
• 5Y*: 8.02%
• 10Y*: 14.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKASX vs. FCPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FKASX Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund	9.95%	12.01%	14.45%	14.48%	-31.40%	2.57%	43.41%	33.44%	7.30%	37.87%
FCPGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund	17.62%	11.20%	20.56%	19.02%	-25.34%	10.50%	36.41%	36.31%	-4.57%	28.99%

Correlation

The correlation between FKASX and FCPGX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2004	0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between FKASX and FCPGX has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FKASX vs. FCPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKASX

FKASX Risk / Return Rank: 19
FKASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
FKASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
FKASX Omega Ratio Rank: 19
FKASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
FKASX Martin Ratio Rank: 26

FCPGX

FCPGX Risk / Return Rank: 47
FCPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
FCPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
FCPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FCPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
FCPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKASX vs. FCPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund (FKASX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FKASX	FCPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.14	1.88	-0.73
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.75	2.56	-0.81
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.32	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.55	3.01	-1.47
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.47	12.15	-5.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FKASX vs. FCPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKASX Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the FCPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKASX and FCPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FKASX	FCPGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.14	1.88	-0.73
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09	0.34	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	0.65	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.53	+0.05

Drawdowns

FKASX vs. FCPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKASX drawdown since its inception was -60.21%, roughly equal to the maximum FCPGX drawdown of -59.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKASX and FCPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FKASX	FCPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.21%	-59.11%	-1.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.88%	-13.12%	-1.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.19%	-28.69%	+2.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.51%	-39.04%	-5.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.86%	-39.04%	-5.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.68%	-1.18%	-1.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.69%	-10.70%	-1.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.57%	3.26%	+0.31%

Volatility

FKASX vs. FCPGX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund (FKASX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) have volatilities of 6.79% and 6.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FKASX	FCPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.79%	6.47%	+0.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.84%	16.30%	+0.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.09%	21.21%	-1.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.38%	23.48%	-0.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.36%	22.84%	-0.48%

FKASX vs. FCPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKASX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than FCPGX's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

FKASX vs. FCPGX - Dividend Comparison

FKASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.83%, more than FCPGX's 5.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCPGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund	5.43%	6.38%	1.37%	0.00%	0.00%	19.27%	8.19%	5.31%	14.35%	6.88%	1.53%	4.32%
FKASX Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund	18.83%	20.70%	11.82%	0.15%	0.00%	8.40%	0.12%	0.21%	6.36%	6.50%	0.76%	8.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FKASX and FCPGX in my portfolio?

FKASX and FCPGX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FKASX or FCPGX?

FKASX has higher volatility (6.79%) compared to FCPGX (6.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKASX dropped -60.21% vs FCPGX's -59.11%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.