PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FKASX vs. FDSVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FKASX vs. FDSVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund (FKASX) and Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund (FDSVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKASX achieves a 9.95% return, which is significantly lower than FDSVX's 14.97% return. Over the past 10 years, FKASX has underperformed FDSVX with an annualized return of 13.51%, while FDSVX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.06% annualized return.


FKASX

1D
-0.33%
1M
4.16%
YTD
9.95%
6M
11.40%
1Y
21.79%
3Y*
14.59%
5Y*
1.98%
10Y*
13.51%

FDSVX

1D
0.68%
1M
6.87%
YTD
14.97%
6M
14.35%
1Y
31.50%
3Y*
25.34%
5Y*
14.77%
10Y*
19.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKASX vs. FDSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FKASX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund
9.95%12.01%14.45%14.48%-31.40%2.57%43.41%33.44%7.30%37.87%
FDSVX
Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund
14.97%15.14%30.19%35.63%-24.43%22.93%43.43%33.77%-0.33%34.63%

Correlation

The correlation between FKASX and FDSVX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2002

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between FKASX and FDSVX has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FKASX vs. FDSVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKASX
FKASX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FKASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKASX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FKASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKASX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

FDSVX
FDSVX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
FDSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FDSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKASX vs. FDSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund (FKASX) and Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund (FDSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FKASXFDSVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.14

1.99

-0.85

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.75

2.67

-0.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.35

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

2.56

-1.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.47

9.77

-3.31

FKASX vs. FDSVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKASX Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the FDSVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKASX and FDSVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FKASXFDSVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

1.99

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.73

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.93

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.54

+0.04

Drawdowns

FKASX vs. FDSVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKASX drawdown since its inception was -60.21%, roughly equal to the maximum FDSVX drawdown of -59.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKASX and FDSVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FKASXFDSVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.21%

-59.34%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.88%

-12.53%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.19%

-23.42%

-2.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.51%

-29.83%

-14.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.86%

-31.09%

-13.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.68%

0.00%

-2.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.69%

-12.61%

-0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.57%

3.28%

+0.29%

Volatility

FKASX vs. FDSVX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund (FKASX) has a higher volatility of 6.79% compared to Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund (FDSVX) at 4.18%. This indicates that FKASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FKASXFDSVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.79%

4.18%

+2.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.84%

12.71%

+4.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.09%

16.37%

+3.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.38%

20.36%

+3.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.36%

20.59%

+1.77%

FKASX vs. FDSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKASX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than FDSVX's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

FKASX vs. FDSVX - Dividend Comparison

FKASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.83%, more than FDSVX's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDSVX
Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund
1.38%1.58%12.81%2.55%3.65%13.46%9.63%4.28%5.02%4.87%0.09%0.17%
FKASX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund
18.83%20.70%11.82%0.15%0.00%8.40%0.12%0.21%6.36%6.50%0.76%8.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


FKASX and FDSVX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FKASX has higher volatility (6.79%) compared to FDSVX (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKASX dropped -60.21% vs FDSVX's -59.34%.

FDSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FKASX and FDSVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer