FKASX vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund (FKASX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
FKASX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Dec 18, 2002. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Performance
FKASX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FKASX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FKASX Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund | -6.24% | 12.01% | 14.45% | 14.48% | -31.40% | 2.57% | 43.41% | 33.44% | 7.30% | 37.87% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | -9.73% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FKASX achieves a -6.24% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's -9.73% return. Over the past 10 years, FKASX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 12.48%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.95% annualized return.
FKASX
- 1D
- 5.40%
- 1M
- -7.88%
- YTD
- -6.24%
- 6M
- -3.66%
- 1Y
- 18.46%
- 3Y*
- 9.82%
- 5Y*
- -1.37%
- 10Y*
- 12.48%
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -4.46%
- YTD
- -9.73%
- 6M
- -8.15%
- 1Y
- 17.00%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 16.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FKASX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FKASX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FKASX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
FKASX
SCHG
FKASX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund (FKASX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FKASX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 0.76 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.37 | 1.24 | +0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.17 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 1.09 | -0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.22 | 3.71 | +0.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FKASX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 0.76 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 | 0.57 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.79 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.79 | -0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between FKASX and SCHG is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FKASX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
FKASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.08%, more than SCHG's 0.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FKASX Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund | 22.08% | 20.70% | 11.82% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 8.40% | 0.12% | 0.21% | 6.36% | 6.50% | 0.76% | 8.55% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
FKASX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FKASX drawdown since its inception was -60.21%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKASX and SCHG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FKASX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.21% | -34.59% | -25.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.88% | -16.41% | +1.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.51% | -34.59% | -9.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.86% | -34.59% | -10.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.01% | -12.51% | -4.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.72% | -5.22% | -7.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.50% | 4.84% | -1.34% |
Volatility
FKASX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund (FKASX) has a higher volatility of 9.37% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 6.77%. This indicates that FKASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FKASX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.37% | 6.77% | +2.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.87% | 12.54% | +3.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.90% | 22.45% | -0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.33% | 22.31% | +1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.26% | 21.51% | +0.75% |