FKASX vs. AGRFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund (FKASX) and AB Growth Fund (AGRFX).
FKASX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Dec 18, 2002. AGRFX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Sep 4, 1990.
Performance
FKASX vs. AGRFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FKASX vs. AGRFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FKASX Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund | -6.24% | 12.01% | 14.45% | 14.48% | -31.40% | 2.57% | 43.41% | 33.44% | 7.30% | 37.87% |
AGRFX AB Growth Fund | -9.55% | 10.84% | 31.50% | 37.95% | -29.65% | 21.40% | 35.97% | 31.11% | 3.75% | 33.88% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FKASX achieves a -6.24% return, which is significantly higher than AGRFX's -9.55% return. Over the past 10 years, FKASX has underperformed AGRFX with an annualized return of 12.48%, while AGRFX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.62% annualized return.
FKASX
- 1D
- 5.40%
- 1M
- -7.88%
- YTD
- -6.24%
- 6M
- -3.66%
- 1Y
- 18.46%
- 3Y*
- 9.82%
- 5Y*
- -1.37%
- 10Y*
- 12.48%
AGRFX
- 1D
- 3.81%
- 1M
- -6.32%
- YTD
- -9.55%
- 6M
- -10.47%
- 1Y
- 9.41%
- 3Y*
- 17.37%
- 5Y*
- 8.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FKASX vs. AGRFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FKASX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than AGRFX's 1.12% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FKASX vs. AGRFX — Risk / Return Rank
FKASX
AGRFX
FKASX vs. AGRFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund (FKASX) and AB Growth Fund (AGRFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FKASX | AGRFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 0.49 | +0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.37 | 0.85 | +0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.11 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 0.64 | +0.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.22 | 2.33 | +1.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FKASX | AGRFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 0.49 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 | 0.43 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.72 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.56 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between FKASX and AGRFX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FKASX vs. AGRFX - Dividend Comparison
FKASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.08%, more than AGRFX's 18.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FKASX Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund | 22.08% | 20.70% | 11.82% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 8.40% | 0.12% | 0.21% | 6.36% | 6.50% | 0.76% | 8.55% |
AGRFX AB Growth Fund | 18.10% | 16.37% | 21.03% | 7.20% | 1.69% | 9.79% | 5.79% | 7.80% | 16.01% | 9.33% | 1.03% | 9.76% |
Drawdowns
FKASX vs. AGRFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FKASX drawdown since its inception was -60.21%, roughly equal to the maximum AGRFX drawdown of -61.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKASX and AGRFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FKASX | AGRFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.21% | -61.88% | +1.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.88% | -15.92% | +1.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.51% | -35.21% | -9.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.86% | -35.21% | -9.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.01% | -12.72% | -4.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.72% | -15.82% | +3.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.50% | 4.35% | -0.85% |
Volatility
FKASX vs. AGRFX - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund (FKASX) has a higher volatility of 9.37% compared to AB Growth Fund (AGRFX) at 7.15%. This indicates that FKASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGRFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FKASX | AGRFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.37% | 7.15% | +2.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.87% | 12.46% | +3.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.90% | 20.85% | +1.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.33% | 20.85% | +2.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.26% | 20.42% | +1.84% |