FICO vs. WDS
FICO (Fair Isaac Corporation) and WDS (Woodside Energy Group Ltd) are both stocks. FICO operates in Software - Application (Technology), while WDS operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 10 years, FICO returned 26.62%/yr vs 7.93%/yr for WDS. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FICO vs. WDS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FICO achieves a -30.25% return, which is significantly lower than WDS's 52.08% return. Over the past 10 years, FICO has outperformed WDS with an annualized return of 26.62%, while WDS has yielded a comparatively lower 7.93% annualized return.
FICO
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 10.76%
- YTD
- -30.25%
- 6M
- -36.09%
- 1Y
- -33.92%
- 3Y*
- 13.73%
- 5Y*
- 18.49%
- 10Y*
- 26.62%
WDS
- 1D
- 6.17%
- 1M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 52.08%
- 6M
- 46.18%
- 1Y
- 58.11%
- 3Y*
- 6.16%
- 5Y*
- 12.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.93%
FICO vs. WDS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FICO Fair Isaac Corporation | -30.25% | -15.08% | 71.04% | 94.46% | 38.03% | -15.14% | 36.39% | 100.36% | 22.06% | 28.52% |
WDS Woodside Energy Group Ltd | 52.08% | 6.78% | -20.60% | -4.42% | 68.06% | -6.77% | -24.23% | 14.38% | -9.70% | 19.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between FICO and WDS is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007 | 0.30 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FICO and WDS has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
FICO:
$28.00B
WDS:
$44.17B
FICO:
$31.51
WDS:
$3.29
FICO:
37.43
WDS:
7.02
FICO:
1.99
WDS:
0.24
FICO:
12.60
WDS:
1.69
FICO:
$2.26B
WDS:
$26.15B
FICO:
$1.90B
WDS:
$9.87B
FICO:
$1.16B
WDS:
$17.06B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FICO vs. WDS — Risk / Return Rank
FICO
WDS
FICO vs. WDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) and Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FICO | WDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.32 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.65 | 3.40 | -4.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | 7.88 | -9.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FICO vs. WDS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FICO drawdown since its inception was -79.26%, roughly equal to the maximum WDS drawdown of -77.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FICO and WDS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FICO | WDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.26% | -77.06% | -2.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.12% | -17.16% | -34.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.28% | -48.77% | -12.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.28% | -48.77% | -12.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.28% | -66.16% | +4.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.50% | -10.20% | -40.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.03% | -39.55% | +21.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.47% | 7.40% | +20.07% |
Volatility
FICO vs. WDS - Volatility Comparison
Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) has a higher volatility of 14.33% compared to Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) at 10.13%. This indicates that FICO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FICO | WDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.33% | 10.13% | +4.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.21% | 24.23% | +14.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.67% | 30.62% | +20.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.73% | 33.40% | +7.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.07% | 33.78% | +4.29% |
Dividends
FICO vs. WDS - Dividend Comparison
FICO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.85%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FICO Fair Isaac Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.07% | 0.08% |
WDS Woodside Energy Group Ltd | 4.85% | 6.80% | 8.27% | 10.62% | 8.84% | 2.39% | 4.41% | 5.12% | 5.45% | 3.65% | 5.21% | 9.84% |
Financials
FICO vs. WDS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fair Isaac Corporation and Woodside Energy Group Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FICO vs. WDS - Profitability Comparison
FICO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported a gross profit of 600.48M and revenue of 691.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.8%.
WDS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported a gross profit of 1.99B and revenue of 6.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.1%.
FICO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported an operating income of 402.47M and revenue of 691.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 58.2%.
WDS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported an operating income of 1.67B and revenue of 6.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.1%.
FICO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported a net income of 264.46M and revenue of 691.68M, resulting in a net margin of 38.2%.
WDS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported a net income of 1.40B and revenue of 6.39B, resulting in a net margin of 21.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FICO and WDS have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FICO has higher volatility (14.33%) compared to WDS (10.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FICO dropped -79.26% vs WDS's -77.06%.
WDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FICO and WDS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer