FICO vs. MUSA
FICO (Fair Isaac Corporation) and MUSA (Murphy USA Inc.) are both stocks. FICO operates in Software - Application (Technology), while MUSA operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, FICO returned 24.21%/yr vs 23.74%/yr for MUSA. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
FICO vs. MUSA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FICO achieves a -33.58% return, which is significantly lower than MUSA's 51.03% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FICO having a 24.21% annualized return and MUSA not far behind at 23.74%.
FICO
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -11.63%
- 6M
- -23.25%
- YTD
- -33.58%
- 1Y
- -18.69%
- 3Y*
- 10.62%
- 5Y*
- 16.47%
- 10Y*
- 24.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.11%
MUSA
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 8.38%
- 6M
- 44.24%
- YTD
- 51.03%
- 1Y
- 68.79%
- 3Y*
- 26.68%
- 5Y*
- 33.41%
- 10Y*
- 23.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 24.17%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $482.91M | $385.62M | $388.77M | |
MUSA Murphy USA Inc. | $157.53M | $157.15M | $171.96M |
FICO vs. MUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FICO Fair Isaac Corporation | -33.58% | -15.08% | 71.04% | 94.46% | 38.03% | -15.14% | 36.39% | 100.36% | 22.06% | 28.52% |
MUSA Murphy USA Inc. | 51.03% | -19.15% | 41.27% | 28.20% | 41.02% | 53.33% | 12.06% | 52.66% | -4.63% | 30.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between FICO and MUSA is -0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2013 | 0.23 |
The correlation between FICO and MUSA shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FICO:
$24.25B
MUSA:
$11.23B
FICO:
$34.47
MUSA:
$29.26
FICO:
32.58
MUSA:
20.77
FICO:
1.73
MUSA:
1.13
FICO:
11.09
MUSA:
0.58
FICO:
$2.39B
MUSA:
$19.68B
FICO:
$2.04B
MUSA:
$487.10M
FICO:
$1.25B
MUSA:
$1.06B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FICO vs. MUSA — Risk / Return Rank
FICO
MUSA
FICO vs. MUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) and Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FICO | MUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.33 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 3.50 | -3.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.81 | 10.30 | -11.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FICO vs. MUSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FICO drawdown since its inception was -79.26%, which is greater than MUSA's maximum drawdown of -35.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FICO and MUSA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FICO | MUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.26% | -35.54% | -43.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.93% | -19.72% | -31.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.28% | -35.54% | -25.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.28% | -35.54% | -25.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.28% | -35.54% | -25.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.86% | -2.41% | -50.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.15% | -9.93% | -8.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.05% | 6.69% | +20.36% |
Volatility
FICO vs. MUSA - Volatility Comparison
Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) has a higher volatility of 22.66% compared to Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) at 9.95%. This indicates that FICO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FICO | MUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.66% | 9.95% | +12.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.32% | 32.19% | +12.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.50% | 39.90% | +13.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.84% | 30.88% | +10.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.52% | 31.59% | +6.93% |
Dividends
FICO vs. MUSA - Dividend Comparison
FICO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FICO Fair Isaac Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.07% | 0.08% |
MUSA Murphy USA Inc. | 0.40% | 0.53% | 0.36% | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
FICO vs. MUSA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fair Isaac Corporation and Murphy USA Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FICO vs. MUSA - Profitability Comparison
FICO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported a gross profit of 587.17M and revenue of 674.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 87.1%.
MUSA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Murphy USA Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
FICO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported an operating income of 362.63M and revenue of 674.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 53.8%.
MUSA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Murphy USA Inc. reported an operating income of 205.20M and revenue of 4.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.
FICO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported a net income of 237.17M and revenue of 674.19M, resulting in a net margin of 35.2%.
MUSA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Murphy USA Inc. reported a net income of 136.30M and revenue of 4.82B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FICO and MUSA have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FICO has higher volatility (22.66%) compared to MUSA (9.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FICO dropped -79.26% vs MUSA's -35.54%.
MUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FICO and MUSA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer