PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHSNX vs. BLNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHSNX vs. BLNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Health Savings Index Fund (FHSNX) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHSNX achieves a 5.36% return, which is significantly lower than BLNDX's 11.76% return.


FHSNX

1D
-0.44%
1M
-1.00%
6M
5.36%
YTD
5.36%
1Y
11.02%
3Y*
9.63%
5Y*
3.71%
10Y*

BLNDX

1D
-0.18%
1M
-4.62%
6M
11.76%
YTD
11.76%
1Y
25.78%
3Y*
9.91%
5Y*
8.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHSNX vs. BLNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FHSNX
Fidelity Health Savings Index Fund
5.36%12.26%7.18%9.32%-15.16%5.16%20.21%
BLNDX
Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional
11.76%4.12%13.11%5.79%3.71%20.16%17.24%

Correlation

The correlation between FHSNX and BLNDX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2020

0.50

The correlation between FHSNX and BLNDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (5 years) to 0.62 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHSNX vs. BLNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHSNX
FHSNX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FHSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FHSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

BLNDX
BLNDX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
BLNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
BLNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHSNX vs. BLNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Health Savings Index Fund (FHSNX) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHSNXBLNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.36

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

3.71

-1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.92

13.71

-2.79

FHSNX vs. BLNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHSNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the BLNDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHSNX and BLNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHSNX vs. BLNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHSNX drawdown since its inception was -19.53%, which is greater than BLNDX's maximum drawdown of -17.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHSNX and BLNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHSNXBLNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.53%

-17.69%

-1.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.41%

-7.24%

+2.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.69%

-17.69%

+11.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.53%

-17.69%

-1.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-5.70%

+4.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.80%

-3.21%

-1.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

1.95%

-0.92%

Volatility

FHSNX vs. BLNDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Health Savings Index Fund (FHSNX) is 2.56%, while Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that FHSNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHSNXBLNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.56%

3.93%

-1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.06%

10.02%

-4.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.86%

12.92%

-7.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.07%

11.75%

-4.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.34%

11.78%

-4.44%

FHSNX vs. BLNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHSNX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BLNDX's 1.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHSNX vs. BLNDX - Dividend Comparison

FHSNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, more than BLNDX's 0.66% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BLNDX
Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional
0.66%0.73%5.74%3.71%2.67%6.11%1.21%
FHSNX
Fidelity Health Savings Index Fund
2.90%2.93%3.06%3.01%3.71%2.57%1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


FHSNX and BLNDX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLNDX has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to FHSNX (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHSNX dropped -19.53% vs BLNDX's -17.69%.

BLNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHSNX and BLNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer