FHSNX vs. FSPGX

In the year-to-date period, FHSNX achieves a 4.03% return, which is significantly higher than FSPGX's -0.26% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FHSNX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Health Savings Index Fund (FHSNX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FHSNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHSNX and FSPGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FHSNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than FSPGX's 0.37% yield.

The maximum FHSNX drawdown since its inception was -19.53%, smaller than the maximum FSPGX drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHSNX and FSPGX.

The current volatility for Fidelity Health Savings Index Fund (FHSNX) is 1.38%, while Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) has a volatility of 5.87%. This indicates that FHSNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.