PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHLC vs. XLVI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHLC vs. XLVI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLVI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHLC achieves a -3.90% return, which is significantly lower than XLVI's -0.67% return.


FHLC

1D
0.82%
1M
1.50%
YTD
-3.90%
6M
-4.11%
1Y
14.43%
3Y*
6.14%
5Y*
4.50%
10Y*
9.14%

XLVI

1D
0.67%
1M
2.30%
YTD
-0.67%
6M
0.76%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHLC vs. XLVI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FHLC and XLVI is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025

0.95

FHLC vs. XLVI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FHLC
XLVI

Healthcare

99.6%

-

Financial Services

0.1%
100.6%

Technology

0.0%

-

Industrials

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

FHLC
99.6%
XLVI

-

Financial Services

FHLC
0.1%
XLVI
100.6%

Technology

FHLC
0.0%
XLVI

-

Industrials

FHLC
0.0%
XLVI

-

Basic Materials

FHLC

-

XLVI

-

Communication Services

FHLC

-

XLVI

-

Consumer Cyclical

FHLC

-

XLVI

-

Consumer Defensive

FHLC

-

XLVI

-

Energy

FHLC

-

XLVI

-

Real Estate

FHLC

-

XLVI

-

Utilities

FHLC

-

XLVI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHLC vs. XLVI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHLC
FHLC Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FHLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHLC Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FHLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHLC Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

XLVI
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHLC vs. XLVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHLCXLVIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.52

FHLC vs. XLVI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHLCXLVIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

1.33

-0.72

Drawdowns

FHLC vs. XLVI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHLC drawdown since its inception was -28.76%, which is greater than XLVI's maximum drawdown of -8.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHLC and XLVI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHLCXLVIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.76%

-8.14%

-20.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.96%

-4.02%

-2.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.19%

-1.95%

-3.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.11%

Volatility

FHLC vs. XLVI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHLCXLVIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.33%

10.94%

+3.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.97%

10.94%

+4.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.81%

10.94%

+5.87%

FHLC vs. XLVI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHLC has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XLVI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHLC vs. XLVI - Dividend Comparison

FHLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than XLVI's 11.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHLC
Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF
1.43%1.40%1.51%1.40%1.30%1.16%1.45%1.18%1.38%1.38%1.40%2.07%
XLVI
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
11.53%5.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FHLC and XLVI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, FHLC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FHLC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLVI.

XLVI has the higher dividend yield at 11.53%, compared with 1.43% for FHLC.

FHLC is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while XLVI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FHLC and 0.35% for XLVI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHLC and XLVI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer