FHLC vs. XLVI
FHLC (Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF) and XLVI (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FHLC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index, while XLVI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. FHLC is passively managed, while XLVI is actively managed. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FHLC charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLVI.
Performance
FHLC vs. XLVI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHLC achieves a -3.90% return, which is significantly lower than XLVI's -0.67% return.
FHLC
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- YTD
- -3.90%
- 6M
- -4.11%
- 1Y
- 14.43%
- 3Y*
- 6.14%
- 5Y*
- 4.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.14%
XLVI
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- -0.67%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FHLC vs. XLVI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF | -3.90% | 17.37% |
XLVI State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | -0.67% | 12.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between FHLC and XLVI is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | 0.95 |
FHLC vs. XLVI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FHLC
XLVI
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
FHLC
XLVI
-
Financial Services
FHLC
XLVI
Technology
FHLC
XLVI
-
Industrials
FHLC
XLVI
-
Basic Materials
FHLC
-
XLVI
-
Communication Services
FHLC
-
XLVI
-
Consumer Cyclical
FHLC
-
XLVI
-
Consumer Defensive
FHLC
-
XLVI
-
Energy
FHLC
-
XLVI
-
Real Estate
FHLC
-
XLVI
-
Utilities
FHLC
-
XLVI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FHLC vs. XLVI — Risk / Return Rank
FHLC
XLVI
FHLC vs. XLVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FHLC | XLVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.52 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FHLC | XLVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 1.33 | -0.72 |
Drawdowns
FHLC vs. XLVI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHLC drawdown since its inception was -28.76%, which is greater than XLVI's maximum drawdown of -8.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHLC and XLVI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHLC | XLVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.76% | -8.14% | -20.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.96% | -4.02% | -2.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.19% | -1.95% | -3.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.11% | — | — |
Volatility
FHLC vs. XLVI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FHLC | XLVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.11% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.33% | 10.94% | +3.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.97% | 10.94% | +4.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.81% | 10.94% | +5.87% |
FHLC vs. XLVI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHLC has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XLVI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FHLC vs. XLVI - Dividend Comparison
FHLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than XLVI's 11.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF | 1.43% | 1.40% | 1.51% | 1.40% | 1.30% | 1.16% | 1.45% | 1.18% | 1.38% | 1.38% | 1.40% | 2.07% |
XLVI State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 11.53% | 5.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, FHLC and XLVI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, FHLC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FHLC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLVI.
XLVI has the higher dividend yield at 11.53%, compared with 1.43% for FHLC.
FHLC is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while XLVI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FHLC and 0.35% for XLVI.
Find the right allocation for FHLC and XLVI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer