FHEQ vs. IWF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FHEQ (Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF) and IWF (iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FHEQ is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by Fidelity, while IWF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index. FHEQ is actively managed, while IWF is passively managed. Over the past year, FHEQ returned 17.16% vs 17.87% for IWF. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FHEQ charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IWF.

Performance

FHEQ vs. IWF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF (FHEQ) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHEQ achieves a 6.23% return, which is significantly higher than IWF's 1.43% return.

FHEQ

• 1D: -1.15%
• 1M: -1.23%
• YTD: 6.23%
• 6M: 5.31%
• 1Y: 17.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IWF

• 1D: -1.60%
• 1M: -4.07%
• YTD: 1.43%
• 6M: 0.16%
• 1Y: 17.87%
• 3Y*: 21.78%
• 5Y*: 12.94%
• 10Y*: 18.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHEQ vs. IWF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FHEQ Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF	6.23%	13.34%	11.10%
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF	1.43%	18.33%	21.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FHEQ and IWF is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2024	0.90

The correlation between FHEQ and IWF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FHEQ vs. IWF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHEQ

FHEQ Risk / Return Rank: 52
FHEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
FHEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
FHEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 52
FHEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
FHEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 53

IWF

IWF Risk / Return Rank: 28
IWF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
IWF Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
IWF Omega Ratio Rank: 30
IWF Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
IWF Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHEQ vs. IWF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF (FHEQ) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FHEQ	IWF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	1.11	+0.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	1.57	+0.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.20	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.22	1.10	+1.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.65	3.59	+5.06

FHEQ vs. IWF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is higher than the IWF Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHEQ and IWF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FHEQ vs. IWF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHEQ drawdown since its inception was -11.12%, smaller than the maximum IWF drawdown of -64.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHEQ and IWF.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHEQ	IWF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.12%	-64.25%	+53.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.77%	-16.27%	+8.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.36%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.72%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.84%	-6.88%	+4.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.83%	-22.05%	+20.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	4.99%	-3.00%

Volatility

FHEQ vs. IWF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF (FHEQ) is 4.02%, while iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) has a volatility of 6.08%. This indicates that FHEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHEQ	IWF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.02%	6.08%	-2.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.46%	12.65%	-5.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.98%	16.24%	-6.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.57%	21.52%	-10.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.57%	21.01%	-10.44%

FHEQ vs. IWF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHEQ has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than IWF's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

FHEQ vs. IWF - Dividend Comparison

FHEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, more than IWF's 0.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHEQ Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF	0.55%	0.63%	0.50%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF	0.36%	0.36%	0.46%	0.67%	0.91%	0.49%	0.66%	0.99%	1.27%	1.10%	1.43%	1.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHEQ and IWF in my portfolio?

FHEQ and IWF have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FHEQ or IWF?

IWF has higher volatility (6.08%) compared to FHEQ (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHEQ dropped -11.12% vs IWF's -64.25%.

Which ETF is better, FHEQ or IWF?

On 1-year performance, IWF leads with 17.87% vs 17.16% for FHEQ. On fees, IWF is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, FHEQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FHEQ or IWF?

Over the 1-year period, IWF has performed better with a 17.87% return vs 17.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FHEQ or IWF?

IWF is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for FHEQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FHEQ or IWF?

FHEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.36% for IWF.

What is the main difference between FHEQ and IWF?

FHEQ is categorized as Equity Hedged, while IWF is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for FHEQ and 0.18% for IWF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.