FHEQ vs. OVLH
FHEQ (Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF) and OVLH (Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FHEQ returned 17.16% vs 15.28% for OVLH. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FHEQ charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for OVLH.
Performance
FHEQ vs. OVLH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHEQ achieves a 6.23% return, which is significantly higher than OVLH's 4.90% return.
FHEQ
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- 6.23%
- 6M
- 5.31%
- 1Y
- 17.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OVLH
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -1.38%
- YTD
- 4.90%
- 6M
- 4.28%
- 1Y
- 15.28%
- 3Y*
- 15.44%
- 5Y*
- 9.11%
- 10Y*
- —
FHEQ vs. OVLH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FHEQ Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF | 6.23% | 13.34% | 11.10% |
OVLH Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF | 4.90% | 15.77% | 11.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between FHEQ and OVLH is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2024 | 0.95 |
The correlation between FHEQ and OVLH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FHEQ vs. OVLH — Risk / Return Rank
FHEQ
OVLH
FHEQ vs. OVLH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF (FHEQ) and Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF (OVLH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FHEQ | OVLH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.31 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 2.41 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.65 | 9.50 | -0.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FHEQ vs. OVLH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHEQ drawdown since its inception was -11.12%, smaller than the maximum OVLH drawdown of -20.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHEQ and OVLH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHEQ | OVLH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.12% | -20.69% | +9.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.77% | -6.36% | -1.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.84% | -2.75% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.83% | -4.99% | +3.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 1.61% | +0.38% |
Volatility
FHEQ vs. OVLH - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF (FHEQ) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF (OVLH) at 3.54%. This indicates that FHEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OVLH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FHEQ | OVLH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.02% | 3.54% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.46% | 6.89% | +0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.98% | 8.96% | +1.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.57% | 11.78% | -1.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.57% | 11.83% | -1.26% |
FHEQ vs. OVLH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHEQ has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than OVLH's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
FHEQ vs. OVLH - Dividend Comparison
FHEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, more than OVLH's 0.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHEQ Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF | 0.55% | 0.63% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OVLH Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF | 0.29% | 0.30% | 0.32% | 0.83% | 0.79% | 0.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, FHEQ and OVLH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FHEQ has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to OVLH (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHEQ dropped -11.12% vs OVLH's -20.69%.
On 1-year performance, FHEQ leads with 17.16% vs 15.28% for OVLH. On fees, FHEQ is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, OVLH has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FHEQ has performed better with a 17.16% return vs 15.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FHEQ is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for OVLH.
FHEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.29% for OVLH.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Liquid Strategies. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for FHEQ and 0.80% for OVLH.
FHEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FHEQ and OVLH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer