FGM vs. CIBR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FGM (First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FGM is a Europe Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Germany Index, while CIBR is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FGM returned 8.09%/yr vs 18.49%/yr for CIBR. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FGM charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.

Performance

FGM vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGM achieves a 4.13% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 28.52% return. Over the past 10 years, FGM has underperformed CIBR with an annualized return of 8.09%, while CIBR has yielded a comparatively higher 18.49% annualized return.

FGM

• 1D: -1.22%
• 1M: 2.88%
• YTD: 4.13%
• 6M: 9.75%
• 1Y: 19.41%
• 3Y*: 22.05%
• 5Y*: 4.19%
• 10Y*: 8.09%

CIBR

• 1D: -2.81%
• 1M: 31.43%
• YTD: 28.52%
• 6M: 24.03%
• 1Y: 25.78%
• 3Y*: 28.32%
• 5Y*: 16.28%
• 10Y*: 18.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGM vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGM First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund	4.13%	63.60%	1.36%	13.28%	-30.46%	6.10%	17.26%	20.77%	-25.14%	44.28%
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	28.52%	13.06%	18.21%	39.71%	-26.46%	19.67%	50.53%	28.52%	1.47%	18.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FGM and CIBR is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2015	0.46

The correlation between FGM and CIBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FGM vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FGM	CIBR
Industrials	40.5%	3.5%
Consumer Cyclical	16.6%	-
Real Estate	10.8%	-
Basic Materials	9.0%	-
Financial Services	8.2%	-
Healthcare	6.4%	-
Communication Services	3.2%	2.6%
Utilities	3.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.2%	-
Energy	-	-
Technology	-	94.0%

Return for Risk

FGM vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGM

FGM Risk / Return Rank: 25
FGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
FGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
FGM Omega Ratio Rank: 26
FGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
FGM Martin Ratio Rank: 26

CIBR

CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 26
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 29
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGM vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FGM	CIBR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.95	1.06	-0.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.42	1.56	-0.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.20	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.10	1.18	-0.08
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.48	2.79	+0.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FGM vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGM Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is comparable to the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGM and CIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FGM	CIBR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95	1.06	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17	0.66	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35	0.79	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.67	-0.32

Drawdowns

FGM vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGM drawdown since its inception was -51.58%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGM and CIBR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGM	CIBR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.58%	-33.89%	-17.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.76%	-21.99%	+4.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.93%	-21.99%	+4.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-51.07%	-33.89%	-17.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.58%	-33.89%	-17.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.43%	-2.81%	-4.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.74%	-8.66%	-6.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.59%	9.25%	-3.66%

Volatility

FGM vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM) is 7.14%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 10.90%. This indicates that FGM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGM	CIBR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.14%	10.90%	-3.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.09%	20.90%	-3.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.51%	24.50%	-3.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.48%	24.95%	-0.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.11%	23.60%	-0.49%

FGM vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGM has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGM vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

FGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, more than CIBR's 0.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	0.45%	0.42%	0.29%	0.42%	0.31%	0.59%	1.10%	0.23%	0.23%	0.10%	0.77%	0.58%
FGM First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund	0.64%	0.66%	2.56%	2.82%	5.44%	1.43%	1.33%	2.30%	2.18%	2.11%	1.33%	1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGM and CIBR in my portfolio?

FGM and CIBR have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FGM or CIBR?

CIBR has higher volatility (10.90%) compared to FGM (7.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGM dropped -51.58% vs CIBR's -33.89%.

Which ETF is better, FGM or CIBR?

On 10-year performance, CIBR leads with 18.49% vs 8.09% for FGM. On fees, CIBR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FGM has been the lower-risk option at 7.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FGM or CIBR?

Over the 10-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 18.49% return vs 8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FGM or CIBR?

CIBR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FGM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FGM or CIBR?

FGM has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.45% for CIBR.

What is the main difference between FGM and CIBR?

FGM is categorized as Europe Equities, while CIBR is Technology Equities. FGM tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Germany Index, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FGM and 0.60% for CIBR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CIBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.