PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGM vs. DAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGM vs. DAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM) and Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGM achieves a 4.13% return, which is significantly higher than DAX's -0.66% return. Over the past 10 years, FGM has underperformed DAX with an annualized return of 8.09%, while DAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.97% annualized return.


FGM

1D
-1.22%
1M
2.88%
YTD
4.13%
6M
9.75%
1Y
19.41%
3Y*
22.05%
5Y*
4.19%
10Y*
8.09%

DAX

1D
-1.53%
1M
2.29%
YTD
-0.66%
6M
2.93%
1Y
3.88%
3Y*
17.88%
5Y*
7.71%
10Y*
8.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGM vs. DAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGM
First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund
4.13%63.60%1.36%13.28%-30.46%6.10%17.26%20.77%-25.14%44.28%
DAX
Global X DAX Germany ETF
-0.66%39.00%10.55%23.62%-18.47%7.73%12.27%22.11%-22.92%28.23%

Correlation

The correlation between FGM and DAX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2014

0.82

The correlation between FGM and DAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

FGM vs. DAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FGM
DAX

Industrials

40.5%
34.8%

Consumer Cyclical

16.6%
7.0%

Real Estate

10.8%
1.0%

Basic Materials

9.0%
5.3%

Financial Services

8.2%
21.0%

Healthcare

6.4%
5.7%

Communication Services

3.2%
6.1%

Utilities

3.2%
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
0.9%

Energy

-

-

Technology

-

13.2%

Industrials

FGM
40.5%
DAX
34.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FGM
16.6%
DAX
7.0%

Real Estate

FGM
10.8%
DAX
1.0%

Basic Materials

FGM
9.0%
DAX
5.3%

Financial Services

FGM
8.2%
DAX
21.0%

Healthcare

FGM
6.4%
DAX
5.7%

Communication Services

FGM
3.2%
DAX
6.1%

Utilities

FGM
3.2%
DAX
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

FGM
2.2%
DAX
0.9%

Energy

FGM

-

DAX

-

Technology

FGM

-

DAX
13.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGM vs. DAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGM
FGM Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
FGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGM Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGM Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

DAX
DAX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
DAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
DAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGM vs. DAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM) and Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGMDAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.95

0.22

+0.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.42

0.44

+0.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.05

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

0.26

+0.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.48

0.83

+2.65

FGM vs. DAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGM Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is higher than the DAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGM and DAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGMDAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

0.22

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.38

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.42

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.35

-0.01

Drawdowns

FGM vs. DAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGM drawdown since its inception was -51.58%, which is greater than DAX's maximum drawdown of -45.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGM and DAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGMDAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.58%

-45.58%

-6.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.76%

-14.82%

-2.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.93%

-16.03%

-1.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.07%

-39.96%

-11.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.58%

-45.58%

-6.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.43%

-4.63%

-2.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.74%

-10.51%

-4.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.59%

4.68%

+0.91%

Volatility

FGM vs. DAX - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM) has a higher volatility of 7.14% compared to Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) at 6.09%. This indicates that FGM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGMDAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.14%

6.09%

+1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.09%

14.37%

+2.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.51%

17.66%

+2.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.48%

20.38%

+4.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.11%

21.28%

+1.83%

FGM vs. DAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGM has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than DAX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGM vs. DAX - Dividend Comparison

FGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than DAX's 1.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DAX
Global X DAX Germany ETF
1.48%1.47%2.24%2.48%2.80%2.65%2.25%2.47%3.33%1.73%1.78%1.41%
FGM
First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund
0.64%0.66%2.56%2.82%5.44%1.43%1.33%2.30%2.18%2.11%1.33%1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGM and DAX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGM has higher volatility (7.14%) compared to DAX (6.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGM dropped -51.58% vs DAX's -45.58%.

On 10-year performance, DAX leads with 8.97% vs 8.09% for FGM. On fees, DAX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DAX has been the lower-risk option at 6.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DAX has performed better with a 8.97% return vs 8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DAX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FGM.

DAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 0.64% for FGM.

FGM tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Germany Index, while DAX tracks DAX Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FGM and 0.20% for DAX.

FGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGM and DAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer