FGIAX vs. MVGIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) and MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund (MVGIX).
FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007. MVGIX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Dec 4, 2013.
Performance
FGIAX vs. MVGIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGIAX vs. MVGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.53% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
MVGIX MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund | -1.45% | 16.30% | 12.64% | 13.71% | -8.21% | 16.84% | 5.47% | 20.59% | -2.40% | 18.49% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGIAX achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly higher than MVGIX's -1.45% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FGIAX having a 8.70% annualized return and MVGIX not far ahead at 8.97%.
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
MVGIX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -8.44%
- YTD
- -1.45%
- 6M
- 0.36%
- 1Y
- 10.67%
- 3Y*
- 12.18%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGIAX vs. MVGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGIAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than MVGIX's 0.74% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGIAX vs. MVGIX — Risk / Return Rank
FGIAX
MVGIX
FGIAX vs. MVGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) and MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund (MVGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGIAX | MVGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.75 | 1.06 | +0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.26 | 1.48 | +0.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.22 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 1.20 | +1.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.12 | 5.19 | +6.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGIAX | MVGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 1.06 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.86 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.73 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.72 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGIAX and MVGIX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FGIAX vs. MVGIX - Dividend Comparison
FGIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.12%, less than MVGIX's 11.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.12% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
MVGIX MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund | 11.10% | 10.94% | 7.84% | 1.88% | 3.98% | 9.43% | 1.55% | 2.79% | 4.98% | 1.95% | 1.60% | 1.94% |
Drawdowns
FGIAX vs. MVGIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGIAX drawdown since its inception was -49.35%, which is greater than MVGIX's maximum drawdown of -30.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGIAX and MVGIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGIAX | MVGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.35% | -30.19% | -19.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | -8.65% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.08% | -18.01% | -3.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.02% | -30.19% | -7.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.78% | -8.44% | +4.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.22% | -2.89% | -4.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 1.99% | -0.21% |
Volatility
FGIAX vs. MVGIX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund (MVGIX) at 3.22%. This indicates that FGIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGIAX | MVGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 3.22% | +0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.09% | 5.74% | +1.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.28% | 10.51% | +1.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.08% | 10.51% | +2.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 12.38% | +2.79% |