MVGIX vs. PORTX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MVGIX (MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund) and PORTX (Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MVGIX returned 9.21%/yr vs 9.68%/yr for PORTX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MVGIX charges 0.74%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for PORTX.

Performance

MVGIX vs. PORTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund (MVGIX) and Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund (PORTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVGIX achieves a 2.72% return, which is significantly lower than PORTX's 7.50% return. Over the past 10 years, MVGIX has underperformed PORTX with an annualized return of 9.21%, while PORTX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.68% annualized return.

MVGIX

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: -1.28%
• YTD: 2.72%
• 6M: 2.60%
• 1Y: 11.06%
• 3Y*: 12.27%
• 5Y*: 8.77%
• 10Y*: 9.21%

PORTX

• 1D: 1.03%
• 1M: 1.61%
• YTD: 7.50%
• 6M: 7.29%
• 1Y: 2.21%
• 3Y*: 6.79%
• 5Y*: 3.26%
• 10Y*: 9.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVGIX vs. PORTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MVGIX MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund	2.72%	16.30%	12.64%	13.71%	-8.21%	16.84%	5.47%	20.59%	-2.40%	18.49%
PORTX Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund	7.50%	1.15%	7.67%	19.02%	-24.04%	22.16%	24.56%	28.20%	-7.24%	27.89%

Correlation

The correlation between MVGIX and PORTX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2013	0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between MVGIX and PORTX has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

MVGIX vs. PORTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVGIX

MVGIX Risk / Return Rank: 20
MVGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
MVGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
MVGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
MVGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
MVGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

PORTX

PORTX Risk / Return Rank: 4
PORTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
PORTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
PORTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
PORTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
PORTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVGIX vs. PORTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund (MVGIX) and Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund (PORTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MVGIX	PORTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	0.13	+1.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.87	0.28	+1.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.06	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.23	0.13	+1.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.89	0.29	+3.59

MVGIX vs. PORTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is higher than the PORTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVGIX and PORTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MVGIX vs. PORTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVGIX drawdown since its inception was -30.19%, smaller than the maximum PORTX drawdown of -51.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVGIX and PORTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MVGIX	PORTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.19%	-51.71%	+21.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.65%	-20.78%	+12.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.70%	-24.56%	+15.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.01%	-31.32%	+13.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.19%	-31.34%	+1.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.57%	-7.52%	+2.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.91%	-11.72%	+8.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.72%	8.40%	-5.68%

Volatility

MVGIX vs. PORTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund (MVGIX) is 2.09%, while Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund (PORTX) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that MVGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PORTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MVGIX	PORTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.09%	4.64%	-2.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.30%	18.83%	-12.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.21%	20.74%	-12.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.54%	19.24%	-8.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.39%	18.22%	-5.83%

MVGIX vs. PORTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVGIX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than PORTX's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

MVGIX vs. PORTX - Dividend Comparison

MVGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.65%, while PORTX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MVGIX MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund	10.65%	10.94%	7.84%	1.88%	3.98%	9.43%	1.55%	2.79%	4.98%	1.95%	1.60%	1.94%
PORTX Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund	0.00%	0.00%	12.61%	5.84%	3.55%	2.61%	1.85%	2.32%	4.50%	2.46%	4.66%	5.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MVGIX and PORTX in my portfolio?

MVGIX and PORTX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MVGIX or PORTX?

PORTX has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to MVGIX (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVGIX dropped -30.19% vs PORTX's -51.71%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MVGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.