FGIAX vs. GLIFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX).
FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007. GLIFX is managed by Lazard.
Performance
FGIAX vs. GLIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGIAX vs. GLIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.53% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
GLIFX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares | 6.94% | 23.85% | 6.71% | 10.89% | -1.33% | 19.91% | -4.51% | 22.27% | -3.82% | 20.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGIAX achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly higher than GLIFX's 6.94% return. Over the past 10 years, FGIAX has underperformed GLIFX with an annualized return of 8.70%, while GLIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.98% annualized return.
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
GLIFX
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- -6.04%
- YTD
- 6.94%
- 6M
- 12.52%
- 1Y
- 24.17%
- 3Y*
- 14.47%
- 5Y*
- 12.27%
- 10Y*
- 9.98%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGIAX vs. GLIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGIAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than GLIFX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGIAX vs. GLIFX — Risk / Return Rank
FGIAX
GLIFX
FGIAX vs. GLIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGIAX | GLIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.75 | 2.28 | -0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.26 | 2.90 | -0.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.44 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 2.78 | -0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.12 | 11.41 | +0.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGIAX | GLIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 2.28 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 1.15 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.76 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.85 | -0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGIAX and GLIFX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FGIAX vs. GLIFX - Dividend Comparison
FGIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.12%, more than GLIFX's 6.31% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.12% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
GLIFX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares | 6.31% | 6.22% | 4.26% | 2.95% | 14.81% | 6.21% | 2.59% | 4.44% | 14.29% | 6.94% | 1.91% | 11.33% |
Drawdowns
FGIAX vs. GLIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGIAX drawdown since its inception was -49.35%, which is greater than GLIFX's maximum drawdown of -29.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGIAX and GLIFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGIAX | GLIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.35% | -29.65% | -19.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | -9.00% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.08% | -17.15% | -3.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.02% | -29.65% | -8.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.78% | -6.13% | +2.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.22% | -3.35% | -3.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 2.19% | -0.41% |
Volatility
FGIAX vs. GLIFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) is 4.05%, while Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) has a volatility of 4.77%. This indicates that FGIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGIAX | GLIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 4.77% | -0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.09% | 7.40% | -0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.28% | 10.73% | +1.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.08% | 10.71% | +2.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 13.25% | +1.92% |