GLIFX vs. PLFRX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GLIFX (Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares) and PLFRX (Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income) are both mutual funds - GLIFX is a Global Equities fund managed by Lazard, while PLFRX is a Bank Loan fund managed by Pacific Funds Series Trust. Over the past 10 years, GLIFX returned 10.21%/yr vs 5.11%/yr for PLFRX. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLIFX charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for PLFRX.

Performance

GLIFX vs. PLFRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) and Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLIFX achieves a 7.16% return, which is significantly higher than PLFRX's 1.32% return. Over the past 10 years, GLIFX has outperformed PLFRX with an annualized return of 10.21%, while PLFRX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.11% annualized return.

GLIFX

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -2.42%
• YTD: 7.16%
• 6M: 7.57%
• 1Y: 15.86%
• 3Y*: 13.85%
• 5Y*: 11.21%
• 10Y*: 10.21%

PLFRX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 1.32%
• 6M: 2.04%
• 1Y: 6.04%
• 3Y*: 8.42%
• 5Y*: 5.90%
• 10Y*: 5.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLIFX vs. PLFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GLIFX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares	7.16%	23.85%	6.71%	10.89%	-1.33%	19.91%	-4.51%	22.27%	-3.82%	20.77%
PLFRX Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income	1.32%	6.68%	8.38%	13.94%	-2.01%	4.36%	1.26%	8.30%	0.39%	4.33%

Correlation

The correlation between GLIFX and PLFRX is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2011	0.17

The correlation between GLIFX and PLFRX shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GLIFX vs. PLFRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLIFX

GLIFX Risk / Return Rank: 23
GLIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
GLIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
GLIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
GLIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
GLIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

PLFRX

PLFRX Risk / Return Rank: 82
PLFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
PLFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
PLFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
PLFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
PLFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLIFX vs. PLFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) and Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GLIFX	PLFRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	2.51	-1.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.95	5.67	-3.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.90	-0.64
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.70	3.57	-1.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.71	12.24	-6.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GLIFX vs. PLFRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLIFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the PLFRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLIFX and PLFRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLIFX	PLFRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.43	2.51	-1.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.03	2.13	-1.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77	1.36	-0.59
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	1.47	-0.63

Drawdowns

GLIFX vs. PLFRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLIFX drawdown since its inception was -29.65%, which is greater than PLFRX's maximum drawdown of -18.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLIFX and PLFRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLIFX	PLFRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.65%	-18.75%	-10.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.00%	-1.73%	-7.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.02%	-2.17%	-7.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.15%	-6.44%	-10.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.65%	-18.75%	-10.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.93%	0.00%	-5.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.36%	-0.73%	-2.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.68%	0.50%	+2.18%

Volatility

GLIFX vs. PLFRX - Volatility Comparison

Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) has a higher volatility of 4.46% compared to Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX) at 0.61%. This indicates that GLIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLIFX	PLFRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.46%	0.61%	+3.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.27%	1.88%	+7.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.72%	2.46%	+8.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.99%	2.78%	+8.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.32%	3.77%	+9.55%

GLIFX vs. PLFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLIFX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than PLFRX's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLIFX vs. PLFRX - Dividend Comparison

GLIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.30%, less than PLFRX's 7.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLIFX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares	6.30%	6.22%	4.26%	2.95%	14.81%	6.21%	2.59%	4.44%	14.29%	6.94%	1.91%	11.33%
PLFRX Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income	7.08%	7.18%	8.47%	8.92%	4.39%	3.65%	3.68%	5.10%	5.03%	4.46%	4.21%	4.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLIFX and PLFRX in my portfolio?

GLIFX and PLFRX have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GLIFX or PLFRX?

GLIFX has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to PLFRX (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLIFX dropped -29.65% vs PLFRX's -18.75%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PLFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.