FGD vs. POW
FGD (First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FGD is a Global Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. FGD is passively managed, while POW is actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FGD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.
Performance
FGD vs. POW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGD achieves a 11.27% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 38.93% return.
FGD
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -1.46%
- 6M
- 9.73%
- YTD
- 11.27%
- 1Y
- 24.35%
- 3Y*
- 20.79%
- 5Y*
- 11.45%
- 10Y*
- 9.69%
POW
- 1D
- -3.60%
- 1M
- -8.76%
- 6M
- 31.71%
- YTD
- 38.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FGD vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FGD First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund | 11.27% | 5.08% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 38.93% | -1.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGD and POW is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGD vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank
FGD
POW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FGD vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FGD | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.25 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FGD vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGD drawdown since its inception was -68.05%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGD and POW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGD | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.05% | -18.37% | -49.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.89% | -18.37% | +16.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.52% | -4.33% | -8.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | — | — |
Volatility
FGD vs. POW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGD | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.20% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.76% | 32.94% | -20.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.91% | 32.94% | -18.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.92% | 32.94% | -15.02% |
FGD vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGD vs. POW - Dividend Comparison
FGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.25%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGD First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund | 5.25% | 5.62% | 5.87% | 6.44% | 5.74% | 5.35% | 6.17% | 5.19% | 5.88% | 4.01% | 4.36% | 5.07% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 0.14% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FGD and POW have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FGD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FGD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.
FGD has the higher dividend yield at 5.25%, compared with 0.14% for POW.
FGD is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FGD and 0.75% for POW.
Find the right allocation for FGD and POW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer