FGD vs. GSIB

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

FGD (First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund) and GSIB (Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FGD is a Global Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index, while GSIB is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Themes. FGD is passively managed, while GSIB is actively managed. Over the past year, FGD returned 32.81% vs 47.83% for GSIB. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FGD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GSIB.

Performance

FGD vs. GSIB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGD achieves a 12.92% return, which is significantly lower than GSIB's 13.98% return.

FGD

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 1.25%
• YTD: 12.92%
• 6M: 13.97%
• 1Y: 32.81%
• 3Y*: 22.51%
• 5Y*: 10.83%
• 10Y*: 10.39%

GSIB

• 1D: 1.92%
• 1M: 6.99%
• YTD: 13.98%
• 6M: 16.88%
• 1Y: 47.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGD vs. GSIB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FGD First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund	12.92%	44.42%	5.71%	2.33%
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	13.98%	61.67%	32.86%	1.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FGD and GSIB is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2023	0.73

The correlation between FGD and GSIB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

FGD vs. GSIB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FGD	GSIB
Financial Services	33.6%	100.0%
Industrials	14.3%	-
Energy	10.0%	-
Communication Services	9.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	9.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.8%	-
Basic Materials	6.4%	-
Utilities	4.9%	-
Real Estate	2.4%	-
Technology	1.2%	-
Healthcare	-	-

Return for Risk

FGD vs. GSIB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGD

FGD Risk / Return Rank: 80
FGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
FGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FGD Omega Ratio Rank: 85
FGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
FGD Martin Ratio Rank: 70

GSIB

GSIB Risk / Return Rank: 81
GSIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
GSIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
GSIB Omega Ratio Rank: 83
GSIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
GSIB Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGD vs. GSIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FGD	GSIB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	2.59	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.37	3.58	-0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.43	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.23	3.28	-0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.28	11.54	-0.26

FGD vs. GSIB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGD Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the GSIB Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGD and GSIB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FGD vs. GSIB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGD drawdown since its inception was -68.05%, which is greater than GSIB's maximum drawdown of -17.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGD and GSIB.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGD	GSIB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.05%	-17.71%	-50.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.82%	-13.90%	+4.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.50%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.44%	0.00%	-0.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.55%	-2.05%	-10.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.81%	3.94%	-1.13%

Volatility

FGD vs. GSIB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) is 3.57%, while Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) has a volatility of 5.59%. This indicates that FGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGD	GSIB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.57%	5.59%	-2.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.98%	14.41%	-4.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.81%	17.63%	-4.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.95%	18.51%	-3.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.21%	18.51%	-0.30%

FGD vs. GSIB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIB's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGD vs. GSIB - Dividend Comparison

FGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%, more than GSIB's 1.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGD First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund	5.01%	5.62%	5.87%	6.44%	5.74%	5.35%	6.17%	5.19%	5.88%	4.01%	4.36%	5.07%
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	1.67%	1.91%	1.67%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGD and GSIB in my portfolio?

FGD and GSIB have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FGD or GSIB?

GSIB has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to FGD (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGD dropped -68.05% vs GSIB's -17.71%.

Which ETF is better, FGD or GSIB?

On 1-year performance, GSIB leads with 47.83% vs 32.81% for FGD. On fees, GSIB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FGD has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FGD or GSIB?

Over the 1-year period, GSIB has performed better with a 47.83% return vs 32.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FGD or GSIB?

GSIB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FGD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FGD or GSIB?

FGD has the higher dividend yield at 5.01%, compared with 1.67% for GSIB.

What is the main difference between FGD and GSIB?

FGD is categorized as Global Equities, while GSIB is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FGD and 0.35% for GSIB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.