FGD vs. ESPO
FGD (First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund) and ESPO (VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FGD is a Global Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index, while ESPO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FGD returned 10.83%/yr vs 5.49%/yr for ESPO. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FGD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for ESPO.
Performance
FGD vs. ESPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGD achieves a 12.92% return, which is significantly higher than ESPO's -15.10% return.
FGD
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- 12.92%
- 6M
- 13.97%
- 1Y
- 32.81%
- 3Y*
- 22.51%
- 5Y*
- 10.83%
- 10Y*
- 10.39%
ESPO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -2.74%
- YTD
- -15.10%
- 6M
- -16.17%
- 1Y
- -14.01%
- 3Y*
- 16.96%
- 5Y*
- 5.49%
- 10Y*
- —
FGD vs. ESPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGD First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund | 12.92% | 44.42% | 5.71% | 8.20% | -7.25% | 20.83% | -5.23% | 20.64% | -8.58% |
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | -15.10% | 25.79% | 47.61% | 33.64% | -34.71% | -2.13% | 83.93% | 42.36% | -12.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGD and ESPO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018 | 0.52 |
The correlation between FGD and ESPO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
FGD vs. ESPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FGD
ESPO
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
Healthcare
-
-
Financial Services
FGD
ESPO
-
Industrials
FGD
ESPO
-
Energy
FGD
ESPO
-
Communication Services
FGD
ESPO
Consumer Defensive
FGD
ESPO
-
Consumer Cyclical
FGD
ESPO
Basic Materials
FGD
ESPO
-
Utilities
FGD
ESPO
-
Real Estate
FGD
ESPO
-
Technology
FGD
ESPO
Healthcare
FGD
-
ESPO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGD vs. ESPO — Risk / Return Rank
FGD
ESPO
FGD vs. ESPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) and VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FGD | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 0.88 | +0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.23 | -0.54 | +3.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.28 | -0.94 | +12.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FGD vs. ESPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGD drawdown since its inception was -68.05%, which is greater than ESPO's maximum drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGD and ESPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGD | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.05% | -50.99% | -17.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.82% | -27.81% | +17.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.50% | -27.81% | +16.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.68% | -48.33% | +19.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -27.19% | +26.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.55% | -15.06% | +2.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 15.95% | -13.14% |
Volatility
FGD vs. ESPO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) is 3.57%, while VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) has a volatility of 4.42%. This indicates that FGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGD | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.57% | 4.42% | -0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.98% | 14.67% | -4.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.81% | 18.83% | -6.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.95% | 25.10% | -10.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.21% | 25.71% | -7.50% |
FGD vs. ESPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than ESPO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGD vs. ESPO - Dividend Comparison
FGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%, more than ESPO's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | 1.47% | 1.24% | 0.44% | 0.96% | 0.91% | 3.36% | 0.12% | 0.22% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FGD First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund | 5.01% | 5.62% | 5.87% | 6.44% | 5.74% | 5.35% | 6.17% | 5.19% | 5.88% | 4.01% | 4.36% | 5.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FGD and ESPO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ESPO has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to FGD (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGD dropped -68.05% vs ESPO's -50.99%.
On 5-year performance, FGD leads with 10.83% vs 5.49% for ESPO. On fees, ESPO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, FGD has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FGD has performed better with a 10.83% return vs 5.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ESPO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FGD.
FGD has the higher dividend yield at 5.01%, compared with 1.47% for ESPO.
FGD is categorized as Global Equities, while ESPO is Large Cap Growth Equities. FGD tracks Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index, while ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FGD and 0.55% for ESPO.
FGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FGD and ESPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer