PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGD vs. BDVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FGD vs. BDVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FGD vs. BDVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGD achieves a 5.86% return, which is significantly higher than BDVL's -0.63% return.


FGD

1D
2.21%
1M
-5.56%
YTD
5.86%
6M
13.83%
1Y
39.89%
3Y*
20.04%
5Y*
11.06%
10Y*
9.62%

BDVL

1D
2.08%
1M
-5.45%
YTD
-0.63%
6M
1.36%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FGD vs. BDVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than BDVL's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FGD vs. BDVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGD
FGD Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGD Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

BDVL
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGD vs. BDVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGDBDVLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.43

FGD vs. BDVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGDBDVLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.27

-0.02

Correlation

The correlation between FGD and BDVL is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FGD vs. BDVL - Dividend Comparison

FGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.34%, more than BDVL's 2.81% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGD
First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund
5.34%5.62%5.87%6.44%5.74%5.35%6.17%5.19%5.88%4.01%4.36%5.07%
BDVL
iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF
2.81%2.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FGD vs. BDVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGD drawdown since its inception was -68.05%, which is greater than BDVL's maximum drawdown of -7.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGD and BDVL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FGDBDVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.05%

-7.71%

-60.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.66%

-5.45%

-1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.67%

-1.17%

-11.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

Volatility

FGD vs. BDVL - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FGDBDVLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.05%

9.29%

+5.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.92%

9.29%

+5.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.29%

9.29%

+9.00%