PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFSM vs. VB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FFSM vs. VB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FFSM vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FFSM
Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF
4.24%14.89%14.38%17.30%-16.35%19.77%
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
1.92%8.87%14.17%18.22%-17.51%9.24%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFSM achieves a 4.24% return, which is significantly higher than VB's 1.92% return.


FFSM

1D
3.63%
1M
-6.13%
YTD
4.24%
6M
9.66%
1Y
27.31%
3Y*
15.82%
5Y*
8.27%
10Y*

VB

1D
3.18%
1M
-5.13%
YTD
1.92%
6M
3.76%
1Y
19.75%
3Y*
13.04%
5Y*
5.35%
10Y*
10.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FFSM vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFSM has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FFSM vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFSM
FFSM Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FFSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFSM Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FFSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFSM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

VB
VB Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFSM vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFSMVBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.21

0.91

+0.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.78

1.41

+0.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.19

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

1.39

+0.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.09

5.97

+2.12

FFSM vs. VB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFSM Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is higher than the VB Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFSM and VB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFSMVBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

0.91

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.26

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.42

+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between FFSM and VB is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FFSM vs. VB - Dividend Comparison

FFSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than VB's 1.34% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFSM
Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF
0.53%0.56%0.62%0.56%0.58%0.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
1.34%1.33%1.30%1.55%1.59%1.24%1.14%1.39%1.67%1.35%1.50%1.48%

Drawdowns

FFSM vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFSM drawdown since its inception was -26.65%, smaller than the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFSM and VB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FFSMVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.65%

-59.56%

+32.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.42%

-14.29%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.65%

-28.15%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.11%

-6.08%

-1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.06%

-8.49%

+0.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

3.32%

+0.08%

Volatility

FFSM vs. VB - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) has a higher volatility of 8.38% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) at 6.84%. This indicates that FFSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FFSMVBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.38%

6.84%

+1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.80%

12.60%

+1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.75%

21.86%

+0.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.55%

20.78%

-0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.61%

21.40%

-0.79%