FFSM vs. RBIL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FFSM (Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FFSM is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. FFSM is actively managed, while RBIL is passively managed. Over the past year, FFSM returned 40.76% vs 4.07% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. FFSM charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

FFSM vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFSM achieves a 21.69% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.32% return.

FFSM

• 1D: -1.51%
• 1M: 4.83%
• YTD: 21.69%
• 6M: 18.97%
• 1Y: 40.76%
• 3Y*: 22.13%
• 5Y*: 11.05%
• 10Y*: —

RBIL

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: 2.32%
• 6M: 2.37%
• 1Y: 4.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFSM vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FFSM Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF	21.69%	15.36%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.32%	2.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FFSM and RBIL is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025	-0.19

Return for Risk

FFSM vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFSM

FFSM Risk / Return Rank: 75
FFSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
FFSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FFSM Omega Ratio Rank: 69
FFSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FFSM Martin Ratio Rank: 83

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 97
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFSM vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FFSM	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	4.35	-2.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.06	6.69	-3.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	2.13	-0.75
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.95	7.82	-3.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.89	42.95	-27.06

FFSM vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFSM Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 4.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFSM and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FFSM vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFSM drawdown since its inception was -26.65%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFSM and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFSM	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.65%	-0.52%	-26.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.37%	-0.52%	-9.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.78%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.65%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.51%	-0.50%	-1.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.79%	-0.07%	-7.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.57%	0.10%	+2.47%

Volatility

FFSM vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) has a higher volatility of 6.36% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.36%. This indicates that FFSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFSM	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.36%	0.36%	+6.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.66%	0.85%	+13.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.65%	0.95%	+17.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.76%	1.07%	+19.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.62%	1.07%	+19.55%

FFSM vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFSM has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFSM vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

FFSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than RBIL's 4.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FFSM Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF	0.43%	0.56%	0.62%	0.56%	0.58%	0.37%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.38%	3.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFSM and RBIL in my portfolio?

FFSM and RBIL have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFSM or RBIL?

FFSM has higher volatility (6.36%) compared to RBIL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFSM dropped -26.65% vs RBIL's -0.52%.

Which ETF is better, FFSM or RBIL?

On 1-year performance, FFSM leads with 40.76% vs 4.07% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FFSM or RBIL?

Over the 1-year period, FFSM has performed better with a 40.76% return vs 4.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FFSM or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FFSM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FFSM or RBIL?

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 0.43% for FFSM.

What is the main difference between FFSM and RBIL?

FFSM is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for FFSM and 0.17% for RBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.35 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.