FFOG vs. FKDNX
FFOG (Franklin Focused Growth ETF) and FKDNX (Franklin DynaTech Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from Franklin Templeton. Over the past year, FFOG returned 23.96% vs 30.72% for FKDNX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FFOG charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FKDNX.
Performance
FFOG vs. FKDNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFOG achieves a 10.66% return, which is significantly lower than FKDNX's 13.49% return.
FFOG
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 5.98%
- YTD
- 10.66%
- 6M
- 9.70%
- 1Y
- 23.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FKDNX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 7.25%
- YTD
- 13.49%
- 6M
- 12.49%
- 1Y
- 30.72%
- 3Y*
- 25.84%
- 5Y*
- 11.35%
- 10Y*
- 18.38%
FFOG vs. FKDNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FFOG Franklin Focused Growth ETF | 10.66% | 17.09% | 38.20% | 12.41% |
FKDNX Franklin DynaTech Fund | 13.49% | 18.59% | 30.57% | 13.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFOG and FKDNX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2023 | 0.98 |
The correlation between FFOG and FKDNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFOG vs. FKDNX — Risk / Return Rank
FFOG
FKDNX
FFOG vs. FKDNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Focused Growth ETF (FFOG) and Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFOG | FKDNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.27 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 1.54 | -0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.25 | 4.79 | -1.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFOG | FKDNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 1.55 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.32 | 0.67 | +0.65 |
Drawdowns
FFOG vs. FKDNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFOG drawdown since its inception was -25.38%, smaller than the maximum FKDNX drawdown of -51.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFOG and FKDNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFOG | FKDNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.38% | -51.63% | +26.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.90% | -20.49% | -1.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -48.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | 0.00% | -0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.59% | -11.25% | +6.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.39% | 6.57% | +0.82% |
Volatility
FFOG vs. FKDNX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Focused Growth ETF (FFOG) and Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) have volatilities of 4.75% and 4.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFOG | FKDNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.75% | 4.76% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.44% | 15.85% | -0.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.03% | 20.38% | -0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.79% | 26.21% | -2.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.79% | 24.61% | -0.82% |
FFOG vs. FKDNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFOG has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FKDNX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFOG vs. FKDNX - Dividend Comparison
FFOG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FKDNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.84%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFOG Franklin Focused Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FKDNX Franklin DynaTech Fund | 9.84% | 11.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 0.74% | 2.92% | 1.77% | 3.55% | 2.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, FFOG and FKDNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FKDNX has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to FFOG (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFOG dropped -25.38% vs FKDNX's -51.63%.
FKDNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FFOG and FKDNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer